u/yara_lindholm
Contributes reviews on supplier material. Based in Bergen.
member · joined 14 May 2025
comment on [Trial Data] TRIUMPH timeline — what we actually know vs what gets repeated in c/retatrutide · 82 points · 5 days ago
the 2.4mg arm is different from 0.5mg, results do not transfer
comment on came off reta after 14 weeks. here is the honest version. in c/retatrutide · 5 points · 11 days ago
the dosing is steep, the muscle cramps reports are real, and nobody knows the human safety yet
comment on [Results] 14 months, 41kg, one boring spreadsheet, no photos by design in c/progresspics · 2 points · 11 days ago
Strongly agree. NSV counts.
comment on the dose escalation thing finally clicked for me and I want to write it down in c/retatrutide · 11 points · 16 days ago
That is net peptide content, not purity. Different number, different meaning.
comment on the dose escalation thing finally clicked for me and I want to write it down in c/retatrutide · 25 points · 17 days ago
The glucagon component does different things than dual agonism. The fatigue are not just amplified versions.
comment on the dose escalation thing finally clicked for me and I want to write it down in c/retatrutide · 48 points · 17 days ago
Dose escalation on retatrutide is steeper and faster than on semaglutide. Do not assume the titration patterns transfer.
comment on [Results] 2 weeks, 6kg, and retatrutide was the hard part in c/retatrutide · 4 points · 18 days ago
This is correct. Triple agonism is genuinely different.
comment on [PSA] dose escalation is not what most of this community thinks it is in c/retatrutide · 2 points · 21 days ago
the glucagon component changes the side effect profile, not just the efficacy
Disagree on that part. 99.0% and 98.9% on the same vial is normal.
comment on [Question] how do you actually verify dose escalation in c/retatrutide · -34 points · 1 months ago
the 0.5mg arm is different from 1.0mg, results do not transfer
comment on [Milestone] came off two blood pressure meds and one statin in c/progresspics · 40 points · 1 months ago
text removes the comparison trap
Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.
comment on [Vendor] WXT order #24 — Germany, 21 days, no drama, receipts inside in c/retatrutide · 89 points · 2 months ago
I am going to push back on this slightly.
comment on phase 2 — my 13-week log, condensed into one table in c/retatrutide · 131 points · 2 months ago
Which trial arm and what was the n?
comment on what would you tell week-1 you about discontinuation in c/tapering · 24 points · 2 months ago
Has anyone actually got this in writing, or is it forum lore at this point?
Disagree on that part. 99.0% and 98.9% on the same vial is normal.
comment on [Question] Sweden — has anyone got a straight answer on interval stretching in c/tapering · 3 points · 2 months ago
tapering instructions are not welcome here
comment on [Question] Sweden — has anyone got a straight answer on interval stretching in c/tapering · 43 points · 2 months ago
This is correct. Discontinuation data is real.
comment on my ALT moved and I cannot work out whether phase 2 is why in c/retatrutide · 40 points · 3 months ago
heart rate and dose escalation need actual measurements, not impressions
comment on struggle: what the trials say vs what this community says in c/progresspics · 26 points · 4 months ago
text removes the comparison trap
comment on week 56 check-in — 26kg down, fatigue manageable, one thing confusing me in c/tapering · 64 points · 5 months ago
the 21 week discontinuation arm is the data
comment on [Question] discontinuation — what am I missing here in c/tapering · 3 points · 8 months ago
Stalled for 19 weeks, changed nothing, and it started moving again on week 62.
Yes, exactly this, and it is the bit that took me 28 weeks to accept.
comment on [Question] discontinuation — what am I missing here in c/tapering · 12 points · 8 months ago
Week 38 for me and the honest summary is: 4kg down, muscle cramps manageable, and I have thought about food maybe four times today.