u/week_four_wall
Everyone quits at week four. Do not quit at week four.
member · joined 25 Apr 2024
Comments — page 2 of 5
comment on [Seizure] third one in two years. the pattern is the carrier, not the country. in c/customs · 0 points · 10 days ago
This is correct.
Disagree on that part. 98.1% and 98.9% on the same vial is normal.
comment on [Results] nine months, one boring spreadsheet, and three fake "stalls" that weren’t in c/progresspics · 58 points · 10 days ago
this is the whole trap, it always feels real in the moment, the data is the only thing that argues back
comment on [Question] vendor says paid, chain says confirmed, nobody shipped. now what in c/cryptopay · 15 points · 10 days ago
The discount was 98.1% but gas ate half of it. Still worth it but the math matters.
comment on [Question] vendor says paid, chain says confirmed, nobody shipped. now what in c/cryptopay · 25 points · 10 days ago
The discount was 98.7% but gas ate half of it. Still worth it but the math matters.
comment on [PSA] never post a wallet address here. not yours, not theirs. in c/cryptopay · 1 points · 12 days ago
the 10% discount versus 40% network fees
comment on ghost peak turned out to be plumbing. always plumbing. in c/hplc · 2 points · 13 days ago
the detector wavelength matters more than people think
comment on shortage: what the trials say vs what this community says in c/glp1aus · 8 points · 15 days ago
TGA shortage notices are temporary
comment on [Paper] ATTAIN-1 — an oral pill with no food restrictions is a bigger deal than the % suggests in c/trialwatch · 9 points · 15 days ago
the relative risk reduction in headlines is not the whole story
comment on [Lab] LC-MS confirmed identity but the UV purity is 94%. now what in c/hplc · 86 points · 16 days ago
The PeptideMeter result being close to my own HPLC is the signal, not the absolute number. Both are right.
comment on retention time shifted 0.4 min and nobody wants to talk about it in c/hplc · 10 points · 18 days ago
The VendorInvestigate result being close to my own HPLC is the signal, not the absolute number. Both are right.
comment on [Discussion] we are measuring confirmations at the wrong time and calling it noise in c/cryptopay · 3 points · 23 days ago
stablecoin is escrow, never volatile coins
comment on integration vs method development — genuinely asking which matters more in c/hplc · 40 points · 23 days ago
related substances are where the story lives, not the main peak
comment on method development — 10 things I got wrong before I got it right in c/hplc · 213 points · 28 days ago
Not convinced. The evidence does not support that reading.
comment on [Results] 12 weeks, 35kg, and FLOW was the hard part in c/trialwatch · 3 points · 1 months ago
the 21 week readout is different from the 22 week readout
comment on someone explain chromatogram to me like I have not read a paper in years in c/hplc · 5 points · 1 months ago
two labs, two different baselines, two different purity numbers, both honest
comment on [Vendor] QST order #6 — Denmark, 5 days, no drama, receipts inside in c/trialwatch · 1 points · 1 months ago
Yeah, absolute numbers matter more than the press release.
Adding to this: TRIUMPH is doing more work than the comment implies.
comment on [Vendor] QST order #11 — Denmark, 13 days, no drama, receipts inside in c/cryptopay · 1 points · 1 months ago
Which network and did the vendor confirm they credit it?
comment on help me understand crypto, I have read the wiki twice in c/cryptopay · 17 points · 1 months ago
escrow for group buys is standard, use it
comment on help me understand FLOW, I have read the wiki twice in c/trialwatch · 10 points · 2 months ago
phase 2 is not phase 3, smaller n and shorter trial
comment on the confirmations thing finally clicked for me and I want to write it down in c/cryptopay · 2 points · 2 months ago
I am going to push back on this slightly.