u/tuva_iyer
Contributes reviews on supplier material. Based in Kochi.
member · joined 10 Jan 2025
comment on [Discussion] are the c/vendorvetting evidence rules too strict (no) in c/meta · 1 points · 4 days ago
the evidence standards are disclosure
comment on [Discussion] the GH secretagogue story is 30 years old and mostly a cautionary tale in c/researchpeptides · 5 points · 17 days ago
The thing nobody prepared me for was the quiet. Not the appetite, the quiet. The constant negotiation in my head about food just stopped.
comment on [Lab] selectivity claims are usually receptor-panel marketing in c/researchpeptides · 5 points · 21 days ago
Yeah, identity is the first question.
comment on [Meta] the research peptides rule is doing its job and people should stop complaining in c/researchpeptides · 74 points · 1 months ago
Strongly agree. Evidence level matters.
comment on [Question] how do you actually verify TB-500 in c/researchpeptides · 21 points · 2 months ago
name the compound precisely, TB-500 and Thymosin Beta-4 are not the same
comment on tried meta for 12 weeks. here is what happened. in c/meta · 2 points · 2 months ago
rules, moderation, ranking, wiki
comment on 19 months in and disclosure is still the thing I get wrong in c/meta · 1 points · 7 months ago
sponsor and disclosure questions are always answered publicly
comment on am I the only one who found TB-500 harder than the injections in c/researchpeptides · 32 points · 8 months ago
No. This is the kind of confident post that gets copied into a screenshot and repeated for years. Where is the evidence.
comment on am I the only one who found TB-500 harder than the injections in c/researchpeptides · 27 points · 8 months ago
This is correct. Name it precisely.
comment on tried wiki for 6 weeks. here is what happened. in c/meta · 4 points · 8 months ago
What are you comparing it against though?
comment on [Meta] the identity rule is doing its job and people should stop complaining in c/researchpeptides · 16 points · 1 year ago
Did anything else change in the same window?
comment on [Discussion] secretagogue is doing more work than we give it credit for in c/researchpeptides · 172 points · 1 year ago
evidence-level statements required: in vitro, rodent, or human
comment on France: meta, and what it actually costs here in c/meta · 39 points · 1 year ago
What was the batch number and which service?
comment on why does nobody talk about secretagogue in c/researchpeptides · 103 points · 1 year ago
the 13-letter analogs are speculative
comment on Spain: meta, and what it actually costs here in c/meta · 118 points · 2 years ago
Strongly agree. Transparency wins.
comment on Spain: meta, and what it actually costs here in c/meta · 1 points · 2 years ago
Edit to your parent would help — the concentration you quoted assumes one scenario and you have written another above it.
comment on disclosure: what the trials say vs what this community says in c/meta · 27 points · 2 years ago
sponsor and disclosure questions are always answered publicly