u/throwaway_9182
Throwaway. One question, one answer, gone.
throwaway account · joined 3 Jan 2025
comment on interesting rodent data, almost no human data, both things are true in c/bpc157 · 2 points · 14 hr ago
research use only, no human protocols, no injection instructions
comment on [Results] A1c 9.1 → 5.4, full table, 14 months in c/t2dglp1 · 14 points · 1 days ago
CGM traces tell a story, numbers alone do not
comment on [Lab] three BPC vials, three vendors, purity all over the place in c/bpc157 · -21 points · 4 days ago
near-zero controlled human data, full stop
comment on [Results] came off insulin entirely and i still check twice a day in c/t2dglp1 · 4 points · 6 days ago
Disagree but this is the good kind of wrong — it is specific enough to be checked.
comment on [PSA] the "send it again and we will refund the first" message is always a scam in c/scamalerts · 96 points · 6 days ago
throwaway because this is embarrassing: i sent it again. $180 gone. i knew about this exact scam and i did it anyway because the email was polite and i was tired.
comment on [Question] does anyone actually feel "done" or is that not a thing in c/maintenancephase · 5 points · 14 days ago
nobody posts about this part and it is the longest part
comment on [Question] does anyone actually feel "done" or is that not a thing in c/maintenancephase · 9 points · 14 days ago
regain is not a moral failing
comment on three years of A1c threads, summarised so you do not have to read them in c/t2dglp1 · 6 points · 26 days ago
The sulphur burps was genuinely awful for three weeks and then simply stopped. I know that is not useful information, but it is what happened.
comment on [Lab] 9th independent test on BCH, and the trend is the interesting part in c/bpc157 · 12 points · 1 months ago
Small correction: the trial was 2 weeks, not 35. Does not change your point but people will quote it.
comment on [Discussion] dose stretching is doing more work than we give it credit for in c/maintenancephase · 148 points · 2 months ago
The evidence standard in c/vendorvetting gets called too strict about once a month, and every time, the thread ends with the complainant agreeing.
comment on three years of lowest effective dose threads, summarised so you do not have to read them in c/maintenancephase · 6 points · 3 months ago
Regain on a taper is expected. 13% back over 32 weeks, which matches the discontinuation data. Planned for it.
comment on three years of lowest effective dose threads, summarised so you do not have to read them in c/maintenancephase · 0 points · 3 months ago
Not to be pedantic but maintenance and goal weight are being used interchangeably and they are not interchangeable in real life.
comment on three years of lowest effective dose threads, summarised so you do not have to read them in c/maintenancephase · 0 points · 3 months ago
food noise returns but not always immediately
comment on sequence — my 15-week log, condensed into one table in c/bpc157 · 3 points · 3 months ago
Strongly agree. Zero human controlled data.
comment on someone explain identity to me like I have not read a paper in years in c/researchpeptides · 13 points · 3 months ago
Strongly agree. Evidence level matters.
comment on switched from 5mg to 2.5mg and the nausea got better, not worse in c/maintenancephase · 110 points · 4 months ago
state how long you have been at maintenance, week 2 is not maintenance
comment on [Question] import — what am I missing here in c/customs · -29 points · 4 months ago
personal-import allowances differ by country
comment on [Question] import — what am I missing here in c/customs · 17 points · 4 months ago
Disagree. What you are describing is consistent with seizure, not with what you concluded.
comment on anyone else notice research peptides kicking in around week 14 in c/researchpeptides · 144 points · 4 months ago
regulatory status varies by country, check yours
comment on three years of glycaemic control threads, summarised so you do not have to read them in c/t2dglp1 · 12 points · 5 months ago
Yeah, glycaemic control is the original use.