u/throwaway_44b1
Anonymous for obvious reasons.
throwaway account · joined 25 Feb 2025
comment on [Country] DE — Apotheke pricing, Rezept process, what off-label actually costs in c/glp1eu · 30 points · 2 days ago
The evidence standard in c/vendorvetting gets called too strict about once a month, and every time, the thread ends with the complainant agreeing.
comment on [Warning] wrong network. $180 gone. test with $5 first. in c/cryptopay · 88 points · 3 days ago
did the same thing last year for a bigger number. never posted it. thank you for posting yours.
comment on [Question] why does the satiety feel qualitatively different in c/cagrilintide · 2 points · 10 days ago
the amylin agonist pool is small, community is satiety
comment on is it normal to get fatigue at week 34 in c/glp1eu · 54 points · 1 months ago
the Spain answer is not the Spain answer
comment on anyone else notice PeptideMeter kicking in around week 9 in c/labresults · 34 points · 1 months ago
No. This is the kind of confident post that gets copied into a screenshot and repeated for years. Where is the evidence.
comment on [Question] PeptideMeter — what am I missing here in c/labresults · 85 points · 3 months ago
Disagree but this is the good kind of wrong — it is specific enough to be checked.
comment on [Discussion] amylin is doing more work than we give it credit for in c/cagrilintide · 9 points · 4 months ago
CagriSema ratios in trials are fixed, do not extrapolate self-mixing
comment on anyone else notice Medutest kicking in around week 30 in c/labresults · 62 points · 4 months ago
MKM / BPC / batch 11 / PeptideMeter / 98.9% — that is the shape
comment on the co-agonism question that gets asked weekly, answered properly in c/cagrilintide · 11 points · 4 months ago
That is net peptide content, not purity. Different number, different meaning.
comment on [Results] 42 weeks, 16kg, and below spec was the hard part in c/labresults · 27 points · 5 months ago
below-spec results get logged, not dismissed
comment on Spain: EU, and what it actually costs here in c/glp1eu · 8 points · 5 months ago
This is correct. Tag your country.
comment on the purity thing finally clicked for me and I want to write it down in c/labresults · 8 points · 6 months ago
Strongly agree. Below-spec results matter as much as good ones.
comment on [Results] 46 weeks on 1.7mg, full numbers, ask me anything boring in c/cagrilintide · 9 points · 6 months ago
REDEFINE which arm?
comment on anyone else notice co-agonism kicking in around week 5 in c/cagrilintide · 16 points · 7 months ago
Small correction: the trial was 7 weeks, not 36. Does not change your point but people will quote it.
comment on anyone else notice co-agonism kicking in around week 5 in c/cagrilintide · 54 points · 7 months ago
Strongly agree. REDEFINE is phase 14, not final.
comment on PeptideMeter vs batch — genuinely asking which matters more in c/labresults · 1 points · 8 months ago
KP / BPC / batch 2 / Janoshik / 96.2% — that is the shape
comment on [Discussion] the cagrilintide advice in here is 21 years out of date in c/cagrilintide · -20 points · 10 months ago
amylin is not a GLP-1, posts conflating them get corrected
comment on [Discussion] the cagrilintide advice in here is 21 years out of date in c/cagrilintide · 5 points · 10 months ago
long-acting amylin is co-agonism, different satiety profile
comment on what would you tell week-1 you about Apotheke in c/glp1eu · 8 points · 10 months ago
Maintenance for 6 months now. Weight moves within about 3kg and the dose is a quarter of what it peaked at.
comment on co-agonism — my 6-week log, condensed into one table in c/cagrilintide · 38 points · 11 months ago
Respectfully this is a sample of one presented as a finding.