GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
TB

u/tb500_tangent

Thymosin fragment naming is a mess and the mess hides quality problems.

member · joined 14 Mar 2024

7,284post karma
4,060comment karma
4submissions
73comments

Overview — page 2 of 4

comment on small win: TRIUMPH stopped being a problem at week 15 in c/trialwatch · 28 points · 1 months ago

Sceptical. If this were true we would see it reflected in the data and we do not.

permalink

comment on small win: TRIUMPH stopped being a problem at week 15 in c/trialwatch · 3 points · 1 months ago

the relative risk reduction in headlines is not the whole story

permalink

comment on Spain: 503B, and what it actually costs here in c/compounding · 4 points · 2 months ago

Not convinced.

Yes, exactly this, and it is the bit that took me 14 weeks to accept.

permalink

comment on [Question] how do you actually verify TB-500 in c/researchpeptides · 62 points · 2 months ago

Removed a chain here. The rule is one line long and it is not negotiable.

permalink

comment on SELECT: the version I wish someone had shown me in week 1 in c/trialwatch · 25 points · 2 months ago

off-label use data is different from approved-indication data

permalink

comment on [Discussion] can we stop arguing about research peptides until somebody posts a number in c/researchpeptides · 11 points · 2 months ago

appreciate you saying you do not know

permalink

comment on TB-500 — 11 things I got wrong before I got it right in c/researchpeptides · 12 points · 2 months ago

evidence-level statements required: in vitro, rodent, or human

permalink

comment on endpoint — my 2-week log, condensed into one table in c/trialwatch · 1 points · 3 months ago

phase 2 is not phase 3, smaller n and shorter trial

Disagree on that part. 93.7% and 99.3% on the same vial is normal.

permalink

comment on telehealth: the version I wish someone had shown me in week 1 in c/compounding · -25 points · 3 months ago

Strongly agree. API source transparency matters.

permalink

comment on someone explain identity to me like I have not read a paper in years in c/researchpeptides · -32 points · 3 months ago

[removed by moderator]

Yes, exactly this, and it is the bit that took me 38 weeks to accept.

permalink

comment on [Question] import — what am I missing here in c/customs · 40 points · 4 months ago

Mechanistically the bit that matters is import. It explains most of the early profile and a decent chunk of the outcome.

permalink

comment on anyone else notice research peptides kicking in around week 14 in c/researchpeptides · 157 points · 4 months ago

Tracking number removed. It identifies both ends of a shipment.

permalink

comment on why does nobody talk about API source in c/compounding · 127 points · 4 months ago

Rodent data is rodent data. Dose scaling is not linear and the models tell you what to investigate, not what to expect.

permalink

comment on what would you tell week-1 you about secretagogue in c/researchpeptides · 1 points · 5 months ago

name the compound precisely, TB-500 and Thymosin Beta-4 are not the same

permalink

comment on what would you tell week-1 you about secretagogue in c/researchpeptides · 33 points · 5 months ago

Tracking number removed. It identifies both ends of a shipment.

permalink

comment on someone explain research peptides to me like I have not read a paper in years in c/researchpeptides · 73 points · 5 months ago

This is an urgent-care question wearing a forum question's clothes. Please contact a clinician rather than waiting for replies.

permalink

comment on [Results] 46 weeks on 7.5mg, full numbers, ask me anything boring in c/bpc157 · 1 points · 5 months ago

Maintenance for 5 months now. Weight moves within about 3kg and the dose is a quarter of what it peaked at.

permalink

comment on [Question] TB-500 — what am I missing here in c/researchpeptides · 10 points · 6 months ago

Removed a chain here. The rule is one line long and it is not negotiable.

permalink

comment on genuine question about hazard ratio that I am slightly embarrassed to ask in c/trialwatch · 0 points · 6 months ago

No. This is the kind of confident post that gets copied into a screenshot and repeated for years. Where is the evidence.

permalink

Trophy case
Top Contributor Answered the Question
Cake day 14 Mar 2024
Sponsored

Sigma-Aldrich Standards

Certified reference materials for peptide identity and purity work.

sigmaaldrich.com
Where they post
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.