u/sunday_shot_sal
Sunday 8pm, every week, 61 weeks straight. Consistency is the whole trick.
member · joined 6 Feb 2025
Comments — page 2 of 4
comment on [Results] 42 weeks, 21kg, and purity was the hard part in c/coa · 201 points · 3 months ago
Are you looking at area% or net peptide content? Different numbers.
comment on [Results] 91 weeks on 1.0mg, full numbers, ask me anything boring in c/glp1muscle · 5 points · 3 months ago
lean mass retention is the 96 week conversation
comment on small win: stability stopped being a problem at week 85 in c/coldchain · 43 points · 3 months ago
stability after excursion is not zero, it is dose-dependent
Disagree on that part. 95.1% and 99.2% on the same vial is normal.
comment on [Question] how do you actually verify A1c in c/t2dglp1 · 3 points · 4 months ago
Sceptical. If this were true we would see it reflected in the data and we do not.
comment on USDC: the version I wish someone had shown me in week 1 in c/cryptopay · -19 points · 5 months ago
no group-buy recruitment, discussing how they fail is fine
comment on [Lab] SGN BPC — VendorInvestigate came back 93.7% against a claimed 94.2% in c/coa · 1 points · 6 months ago
Cosigning. The batch number is load-bearing information.
comment on am I the only one who found protein harder than the injections in c/glp1muscle · 0 points · 6 months ago
Yeah, protein matters on rapid loss.
Adding to this: DEXA is doing more work than the comment implies.
comment on [Discussion] cold chain is doing more work than we give it credit for in c/coldchain · 3 points · 7 months ago
The gel pack lasted 22 hours in a courier van, then liquid. Powder itself fine, the cold chain mostly died in transit.
comment on small win: A1c stopped being a problem at week 51 in c/t2dglp1 · 24 points · 8 months ago
no medication-stopping advice, ever
comment on three years of protein threads, summarised so you do not have to read them in c/glp1muscle · 62 points · 8 months ago
rapid loss plus no protein equals muscle loss
comment on help me understand log, I have read the wiki twice in c/dosinglogs · 0 points · 9 months ago
logs that stop 7 days get Concluded flair automatically
comment on [Lab] 15th independent test on QSC, and the trend is the interesting part in c/coa · 1 points · 10 months ago
area% is not mass%, and here is exactly why it matters
comment on three years of data logger threads, summarised so you do not have to read them in c/coldchain · 1 points · 10 months ago
no tracking numbers, no full addresses, no label photos — instant removal
comment on small win: protein stopped being a problem at week 71 in c/glp1muscle · 101 points · 10 months ago
The muscle cramps was genuinely awful for three weeks and then simply stopped. I know that is not useful information, but it is what happened.
comment on [PSA] glycaemic control is not what most of this community thinks it is in c/t2dglp1 · 6 points · 11 months ago
CGM traces tell a story, numbers alone do not
comment on [PSA] glycaemic control is not what most of this community thinks it is in c/t2dglp1 · 5 points · 11 months ago
This is an urgent-care question wearing a forum question's clothes.
Disagree on that part. 98.3% and 98.4% on the same vial is normal.
comment on [Discussion] the purity advice in here is 9 years out of date in c/coa · 8 points · 1 year ago
What is the method line say?
Disagree on that part. 98.4% and 98.3% on the same vial is normal.
comment on [PSA] COA is not what most of this community thinks it is in c/coa · 53 points · 1 year ago
This is the "correlation is mechanism" thing again. You changed three variables at once.
comment on [PSA] COA is not what most of this community thinks it is in c/coa · 123 points · 1 year ago
What were the related substances listed individually?
comment on [PSA] COA is not what most of this community thinks it is in c/coa · 425 points · 1 year ago
Yeah, 96.8% area is not the problem, the missing impurity breakdown is the problem.