u/sunday_shot_sal
Sunday 8pm, every week, 61 weeks straight. Consistency is the whole trick.
member · joined 6 Feb 2025
comment on stretching the interval to 8 or 9 days instead of exactly 7 — smoothing tool or just messing with steady state in c/semaglutide · 31 points · 1 days ago
this is exactly why I never stretch mine even a day, Sunday 8pm every single week, the discipline of the fixed schedule is worth more to me than any theoretical smoothing benefit
comment on [Explainer] half-life is 168 hours. that is why your injection day barely matters. in c/glp1science · 104 points · 1 days ago
sunday 8pm, 61 weeks straight, same logic in reverse. consistency is the whole trick and the day is arbitrary.
comment on has anyone actually found their floor — the lowest dose that still holds the line in c/maintenancephase · 33 points · 3 days ago
61 weeks in, haven't tried going lower, mostly because the routine itself (Sunday 8pm) is doing psychological work for me beyond just the dose, don't want to mess with something that's working on two levels
comment on [Log] eight weeks in, here’s the actual schedule and what each step felt like in c/tirzepatide · 143 points · 3 days ago
Sunday 8pm gang. 61 weeks straight here and the consistency of the day/time matters more than people think, it turns it into a non-decision instead of a daily debate.
comment on [Question] which networks do vendors actually credit reliably in c/cryptopay · 7 points · 4 days ago
escrow for group buys is standard, use it
comment on [Question] protein target in g/kg — of current weight or goal weight in c/glp1muscle · 2 points · 6 days ago
Came off after 24 weeks for financial reasons.
Disagree on that part. 98.1% and 97.4% on the same vial is normal.
comment on [Suspicious] identical chromatogram on two different compounds from the same vendor in c/coa · 159 points · 10 days ago
I am going to push back on this slightly.
comment on [Data] BIA vs DEXA on the same day, 6% apart, pick a method and stay with it in c/glp1muscle · 11 points · 11 days ago
Not convinced. The evidence does not support that reading.
comment on [PSA] never post a wallet address here. not yours, not theirs. in c/cryptopay · 1 points · 12 days ago
the 17% discount versus 15% network fees
comment on [Question] creatine while eating 1,400 calories — worth it in c/glp1muscle · 3 points · 19 days ago
rapid loss plus no protein equals muscle loss
comment on [Discussion] the lean mass advice in here is 19 years out of date in c/glp1muscle · 46 points · 1 months ago
Strongly agree. Resistance training counts.
comment on anyone else notice ice pack kicking in around week 30 in c/coldchain · 44 points · 1 months ago
excursion claims need a logger trace or a photo at unboxing, not "it felt warm"
comment on the water content question that gets asked weekly, answered properly in c/coa · 18 points · 1 months ago
I am going to push back on this slightly.
comment on [Meta] proposal — a flair for FFMI posts in c/glp1muscle · 74 points · 1 months ago
body-composition claims need a method
comment on [Vendor] QST order #17 — Canada, 31 days, no drama, receipts inside in c/dosinglogs · 1 points · 2 months ago
the 19 month update is the real test
comment on [Question] DEXA — what am I missing here in c/glp1muscle · 47 points · 2 months ago
Flair changed to match the content.
Adding to this: sarcopenia is doing more work than the comment implies.
comment on crypto — my 18-week log, condensed into one table in c/cryptopay · 192 points · 3 months ago
never post a wallet address, not yours, not a vendor's
comment on [Meta] proposal — a flair for log posts in c/dosinglogs · 45 points · 3 months ago
No. This is the kind of confident post that gets copied into a screenshot and repeated for years. Where is the evidence.
comment on glycaemic control: the version I wish someone had shown me in week 1 in c/t2dglp1 · 7 points · 3 months ago
The confident tone is doing a lot of work that the evidence is not.
comment on what would you tell week-1 you about DEXA in c/glp1muscle · 2 points · 3 months ago
resistance training is sarcopenia not optional