195
France: mg/mL, and what it actually costs here
Right, the units question again, but with numbers this time. I have 5 data points over 30 weeks. The pattern is consistent enough that I do not think it is chance, and…
u/soren_zamora
Contributes reviews on supplier material. Based in Łódź.
member · joined 13 Apr 2025
12,002post karma
5,250comment karma
4submissions
77comments
Overview — page 2 of 5
comment on [Lab] SGN BPC — VendorInvestigate came back 93.7% against a claimed 94.2% in c/coa · 1 points · 6 months ago
no "is this good?" without saying what the compound and claimed purity are
comment on [Lab] SGN BPC — VendorInvestigate came back 93.7% against a claimed 94.2% in c/coa · 0 points · 6 months ago
redact your own name, not the vendor's batch details
comment on [Lab] SGN BPC — VendorInvestigate came back 93.7% against a claimed 94.2% in c/coa · 704 points · 6 months ago
Asked WXT for the batch-specific COA and they sent it within six hours, full document, batch number, date, everything. That is the baseline.
7.3k
[Lab] SGN BPC — VendorInvestigate came back 93.7% against a claimed 94.2%
Genuinely asking, not being difficult. Everyone in c/scamalerts repeats that COA is important. I believe it, but I have never seen anyone show why, and when I search I…
comment on [PSA] Medutest is not what most of this community thinks it is in c/vendorvetting · 15 points · 6 months ago
Slight fix: the number was 98.7, not 98.9. Decimal point, but a fairly consequential one.
comment on week 51 check-in — 11kg down, the food-noise thing manageable, one thing confusing me in c/vendorvetting · 2 points · 6 months ago
Did you test the vial you received or are we going off the vendor COA?
Adding to this: PeptideMeter is doing more work than the comment implies.
comment on [Results] 22 weeks, 16kg, and goal was the hard part in c/progresspics · 58 points · 7 months ago
text only is the whole point of the community
comment on [Discussion] can we stop arguing about bacteriostatic water until somebody posts a number in c/reconstitution · 3 points · 7 months ago
dosing errors come from people reconstituting two vials differently and forgetting which is which
Yes, exactly this, and it is the bit that took me 38 weeks to accept.
comment on [Discussion] can we stop arguing about bacteriostatic water until somebody posts a number in c/reconstitution · 16 points · 7 months ago
Is that 30mg vial or 12mg?
comment on timeframe: what the trials say vs what this community says in c/progresspics · 6 points · 7 months ago
Disagree. What you are describing is consistent with non-scale victory, not with what you concluded.
comment on [Question] milestone — what am I missing here in c/progresspics · 0 points · 8 months ago
That is net peptide content, not purity. Different number, different meaning.
comment on three years of dead space threads, summarised so you do not have to read them in c/reconstitution · 27 points · 8 months ago
Sceptical. If this were true we would see it reflected in the data and we do not.
comment on week 56 check-in — 12kg down, injection-site soreness manageable, one thing confusing me in c/coa · 28 points · 9 months ago
This is the correct framing. The COA structure matters as much as the number.
comment on [Question] how do you actually verify reconstitution in c/reconstitution · 1 points · 9 months ago
never post a calculation as advice without stating the concentration
comment on what changed for me between week 45 and week 88 in c/coa · 154 points · 9 months ago
no "is this good?" without saying what the compound and claimed purity are
comment on [Results] 82 weeks, 15kg, and progress was the hard part in c/progresspics · 16 points · 9 months ago
Did anything else change in the same window?
comment on why does nobody talk about dead space in c/reconstitution · 50 points · 10 months ago
Cosigning. The concentration on the vial in marker is load-bearing.
comment on [PSA] order records is not what most of this community thinks it is in c/vendorvetting · 12 points · 10 months ago
GL Biochem three times. First two perfect, third arrived with a gel pack failure. Powder tested 95.1% anyway, so no harm done.
comment on [PSA] order records is not what most of this community thinks it is in c/vendorvetting · 36 points · 10 months ago
positive and negative reports both need the same evidence standard