u/slow_logbook_ftw
I post rarely and I check my numbers twice.
member · joined 28 Jul 2026
comment on why is nobody talking about the SURPASS-CVOT readout in c/tirzepatide · 5 points · 5 days ago
the early fullness from tirz is different, not necessarily worse
comment on [Caution] research use only. handling questions welcome, protocols are not. in c/bpc157 · 4 points · 7 days ago
Week 66 for me and the honest summary is: 29kg down, sulphur burps manageable, and I have thought about food maybe four times today.
comment on [Discussion] "tirz is stronger than sema" needs a comparator dose or it means nothing in c/tirzepatide · 34 points · 8 days ago
Switched from sema at 1.0mg to tirz at 1.0mg. Different drugs, cannot compare the doses directly.
comment on [Discussion] "tirz is stronger than sema" needs a comparator dose or it means nothing in c/tirzepatide · 37 points · 9 days ago
Yeah, dual agonism does produce a different appetite profile than GLP-1 alone.
comment on [Discussion] "tirz is stronger than sema" needs a comparator dose or it means nothing in c/tirzepatide · 45 points · 9 days ago
week 59 on Mounjaro and the appetite profile is genuinely different from sema
comment on GIP agonism explained like i am five, please in c/tirzepatide · 35 points · 10 days ago
Yeah, dual agonism does produce a different appetite profile than GLP-1 alone.
comment on muscle cramps turned out to be sodium, not magnesium in c/sideeffects · 23 points · 11 days ago
nausea on day 2 is normal, nausea after week 80 is worth checking
comment on [Titration] 12 weeks per step is not too slow, it is just unfashionable in c/tirzepatide · 128 points · 14 days ago
Week 89 on Mounjaro and 17kg down. The appetite reduction feels different from sema in ways I do not have words for yet.
comment on anyone else find 15mg genuinely unpleasant with no extra loss in c/tirzepatide · 5 points · 17 days ago
the 15mg is the top of the pen, not the required dose
comment on [Below Spec] 88% is not "basically fine" and i am tired of that reply in c/labresults · 31 points · 22 days ago
below-spec results get logged, not dismissed
comment on [Below Spec] 94.1% with a 1.8% single impurity. is that the des-amido in c/labresults · 6 points · 1 months ago
Yeah, the Janoshik number matching the claim is the actual signal.
comment on [Below Spec] 94.1% with a 1.8% single impurity. is that the des-amido in c/labresults · 1 points · 1 months ago
Is that 98.6% area or mass?
comment on [PSA] Medutest results are area% by default and people keep forgetting in c/tirzepatide · 356 points · 1 months ago
Disagree but this is the good kind of wrong — it is specific enough to be checked.
comment on [Results] 90 weeks, full dose-and-weight table, ask me anything in c/progresspics · 9 points · 1 months ago
Inter-lab variance on this kind of assay is routinely 1–2 points. Different column, different gradient, different integration.
comment on [PSA] batch is not what most of this community thinks it is in c/labresults · 44 points · 2 months ago
GGPeps product, VendorInvestigate test, 99.0% result, batch 10, 28 days in transit. Logged.
comment on what would you tell week-1 you about fatigue in c/sideeffects · 7 points · 2 months ago
severe abdominal pain is an urgent-care question, not a forum question
comment on [Discussion] Janoshik is doing more work than we give it credit for in c/labresults · 50 points · 2 months ago
sample of one, say so
comment on [Vendor] QST order #13 — Denmark, 39 days, no drama, receipts inside in c/sideeffects · 78 points · 2 months ago
The evidence standard in c/vendorvetting gets called too strict about once a month, and every time, the thread ends with the complainant agreeing.
comment on unpopular opinion: BPC-157 is massively overrated in c/bpc157 · 1 points · 2 months ago
handlers in the community are rare and cautious
comment on France: BPC-157, and what it actually costs here in c/bpc157 · 9 points · 3 months ago
tendon and rodent data literature in rodents is interesting