u/signe_villalobos
Contributes reviews on supplier material. Based in Kristiansand.
member · joined 17 Aug 2025
comment on [PCOS] insulin resistance, cycles, and the thing that finally worked in c/glp1women · 2 points · 2 days ago
You have restated the marketing copy. What is the actual substance here.
comment on [Trial Data] TRIUMPH timeline — what we actually know vs what gets repeated in c/retatrutide · 4 points · 4 days ago
the glucagon component changes the side effect profile, not just the efficacy
comment on [Vendor] KP reship policy actually honoured — receipts inside in c/vendorvetting · 0 points · 4 days ago
independent test or vendor COA, which is it
comment on [Question] resting heart rate up 7bpm, week 6, is that a thing in c/sideeffects · 1 points · 7 days ago
Slight fix: the number was 98.7, not 98.9. Decimal point, but a fairly consequential one.
comment on [Discussion] dose-response looked steeper than anything else in the class and that cuts both ways in c/retatrutide · 3 points · 7 days ago
TRIUMPH data is phase 2, not phase 3, smaller n and shorter
comment on reta made me not want food OR water and that is its own problem in c/retatrutide · 3 points · 9 days ago
Are you quoting phase 2 or is there phase 3 data now?
comment on [Titration] 12 weeks per step is not too slow, it is just unfashionable in c/tirzepatide · 50 points · 14 days ago
Tried both. Sema worked, tirz worked better for me, but my constipation profile was worse on tirz.
comment on the dose escalation thing finally clicked for me and I want to write it down in c/retatrutide · 10 points · 16 days ago
Yeah, phase 2 retatrutide is interesting but it is not comparable to phase 3 compounds.
comment on [Lab] identity confirmed but net peptide content was 71% in c/bpc157 · 94 points · 16 days ago
The thing nobody prepared me for was the quiet. Not the appetite, the quiet. The constant negotiation in my head about food just stopped.
comment on [Results] 2 weeks, 6kg, and retatrutide was the hard part in c/retatrutide · 37 points · 20 days ago
This is correct. Triple agonism is genuinely different.
comment on small win: pentadecapeptide stopped being a problem at week 15 in c/bpc157 · 31 points · 21 days ago
comment on [PSA] dose escalation is not what most of this community thinks it is in c/retatrutide · 32 points · 22 days ago
TRIUMPH phase 2 showed 98.7% weight loss but the constipation profile on the highest arm was rough. Phase 2 != phase 3.
comment on [Results] 57 weeks, 36kg, and gallbladder was the hard part in c/sideeffects · 12 points · 1 months ago
Strongly agree. Describe your dose, your week number, and your titration speed or nobody can help.
comment on stalled for 14 weeks at 5mg and I refuse to panic this time in c/sideeffects · 55 points · 1 months ago
Has anything else changed? Sleep, food, protein, anything?
comment on perimenopause — 8 things I got wrong before I got it right in c/glp1women · 108 points · 1 months ago
comment on fatigue — 12 things I got wrong before I got it right in c/sideeffects · 14 points · 1 months ago
the muscle cramps passes. i promise. not medical advice.
comment on [Question] how do you actually verify Mounjaro in c/tirzepatide · 4 points · 1 months ago
How long at each step before you escalated?
comment on [Lab] SSA BPC — Medutest came back 97.4% against a claimed 96.2% in c/bpc157 · 25 points · 1 months ago
Crossposting this to c/vendorvetting because the people who need it are not reading this community.
comment on [Question] how do you actually verify pentadecapeptide in c/bpc157 · 7 points · 1 months ago
Dead space in the needle hub holds a small but non-trivial volume. On low-volume draws that can be several units.
comment on the glucagon question that gets asked weekly, answered properly in c/retatrutide · 1 points · 1 months ago
TRIUMPH data is phase 2, not phase 3, smaller n and shorter