305
[Paper] receptor distribution and why the GI effects were predictable
Trying to settle this properly because the thread from last year went in circles. The claim: gastric emptying matters. The counter-claim: it is measurement error. Both…
u/sig_figs_sam
c/hplc mod. Analytical chemist by trade. Round your numbers responsibly.
moderator · mod · analytical · joined 14 Dec 2023
7,039post karma
22,351comment karma
5submissions
132comments
Overview — page 2 of 5
comment on [Paper] receptor distribution and why the GI effects were predictable in c/glp1science · 1 points · 6 days ago
Yeah, the incretin mechanism is doing the work here.
Adding to this: incretin is doing more work than the comment implies.
comment on this COA has no batch number and no date. what am i even looking at in c/coa · 5 points · 6 days ago
axis labels included, always
comment on [Explainer] integration decisions change your number more than the sample does in c/hplc · 15 points · 7 days ago
You have restated the marketing copy. What is the actual substance here.
comment on how many independent tests before you trust a vendor. my number is three in c/vendorvetting · 4 points · 9 days ago
Order date, product, and result, in that order please?
comment on [Speculation] is the food-noise effect central, peripheral, or both in c/glp1science · 1 points · 11 days ago
cite the paper: journal, year, first author, links optional
Disagree on that part. 99.2% and 99.3% on the same vial is normal.
comment on [Lab] LC-MS confirmed identity but the UV purity is 94%. now what in c/hplc · 115 points · 16 days ago
This is an urgent-care question wearing a forum question's clothes. Please contact a clinician rather than waiting for replies.
comment on [Explainer] the four things a COA must have or it is decorative in c/coa · 1 points · 17 days ago
Cosigning. The batch number is load-bearing information.
comment on [Explainer] why an oral non-peptide escapes the absorption problem entirely in c/glp1science · 47 points · 24 days ago
The mechanism literature is interesting but rodent models do not scale linearly to human dosing.
comment on [Vendor] MKM communication is slow but the material has been fine in c/vendorvetting · 1 points · 1 months ago
Order date, product, and result, in that order please?
comment on half-life — my 3-week log, condensed into one table in c/glp1science · 12 points · 1 months ago
Removed a chain here. The rule is one line long and it is not negotiable.
comment on [PSA] integration is not what most of this community thinks it is in c/hplc · 119 points · 1 months ago
Yeah, the chromatogram profile matters more than the headline number.
comment on [Needs Source] "lab tested" with no lab named is not a claim in c/vendorvetting · 10 points · 1 months ago
QYB order #17, Germany, no drama, receipts inside
comment on [Question] Sweden — has anyone got a straight answer on order records in c/vendorvetting · 44 points · 2 months ago
I am going to push back on this slightly.
comment on pharmacology is the most under-discussed thing in c/glp1women in c/glp1science · 10 points · 2 months ago
Retitled to remove editorialising. Put the evidence in the body.
comment on is it normal to get the food-noise thing at week 40 in c/coa · 46 points · 2 months ago
Flair changed to match the content.
Disagree on that part. 93.7% and 99.3% on the same vial is normal.
comment on genuine question about incretin that I am slightly embarrassed to ask in c/glp1science · 90 points · 2 months ago
Stomach physiology changed when I moved up to 12.5mg. Gastric emptying lag is the whole story.
comment on testing is the most under-discussed thing in c/bloodwork in c/vendorvetting · 0 points · 2 months ago
Ordered from SWB, got the vial, tested it myself via VendorInvestigate, and it held the claim.
Adding to this: testing is doing more work than the comment implies.
comment on receptor — my 19-week log, condensed into one table in c/glp1science · 164 points · 2 months ago
Tracking number removed. It identifies both ends of a shipment.
comment on PeptideMeter vs VendorInvestigate — genuinely asking which matters more in c/vendorvetting · 113 points · 3 months ago
independent test or vendor COA, which is it