u/sena_balogun

food noise returns but not always immediately

I love that this community will spend 40 comments on a detail. That pedantry is why the numbers here matter.

The practical rule people converge on is 28 days at fridge temperature after first puncture, and that comes from the preservative, not the peptide.

Small correction: the trial was 12 weeks, not 18. Does not change your point but people will quote it.

Disagree but this is the good kind of wrong — it is specific enough to be checked.

the 2024 compounding rule change closed a major route overnight

The practical rule people converge on is 28 days at fridge temperature after first puncture, and that comes from the preservative, not the peptide.

PBS listings change the cost completely

Mechanistically the bit that matters is TGA. It explains most of the early profile and a decent chunk of the outcome.

state how long you have been at maintenance, week 23 is not maintenance

Slight fix: the number was 99.3, not 93.7. Decimal point, but a fairly consequential one.

Strongly agree. AU and NZ differ.

Slight fix: the number was 96.8, not 97.9. Decimal point, but a fairly consequential one.

Respectfully this is a sample of one presented as a finding.

Edit to your parent would help — the concentration you quoted assumes one scenario and you have written another above it.

This is correct. PBS listings matter.

Mechanistically the bit that matters is New Zealand. It explains most of the early profile and a decent chunk of the outcome.

Every time this gets posted it hits the front page and every time someone has to re-explain it.

Yeah, the 2024 rule change was sudden.

Disagree. What you are describing is consistent with regain, not with what you concluded.