Confession thread, sort of. I went from 5mg to 1.7mg much faster than I should have because the scale had stalled and I got impatient. The stall broke about 8 weeks…
u/santiago_szabo
Contributes reviews on supplier material. Based in Utrecht.
member · joined 15 Jun 2025
Overview — page 2 of 4
comment on stalled for 10 weeks at 2.4mg and I refuse to panic this time in c/progresspics · 1 points · 3 months ago
no images, none, not even redacted ones
comment on ALT: what the trials say vs what this community says in c/bloodwork · 20 points · 4 months ago
Inter-lab variance on this kind of assay is routinely 1–2 points. Different column, different gradient, different integration.
comment on does A1c actually matter or is it forum lore at this point in c/bloodwork · 35 points · 5 months ago
ApoB over LDL-C, that is the hierarchy
comment on nobody warned me about nausea and I would have liked the warning in c/coa · 108 points · 5 months ago
chromatogram or it did not happen
comment on nobody warned me about nausea and I would have liked the warning in c/coa · 441 points · 5 months ago
purity and net content are two different numbers, same vial
Disagree on that part. 98.7% and 97.6% on the same vial is normal.
comment on stalled for 22 weeks at 1.0mg and I refuse to panic this time in c/coa · 1 points · 6 months ago
post the whole document, not the headline number
comment on anyone else notice water content kicking in around week 39 in c/coa · 1 points · 7 months ago
Small correction: the trial was 22 weeks, not 34. Does not change your point but people will quote it.
comment on anyone else notice water content kicking in around week 39 in c/coa · 0 points · 7 months ago
the method line is doing real work, not just window dressing
comment on anyone else notice water content kicking in around week 39 in c/coa · 51 points · 7 months ago
The evidence standard in c/vendorvetting gets called too strict about once a month, and every time, the thread ends with the complainant agreeing.
comment on the COA thing finally clicked for me and I want to write it down in c/coa · 71 points · 7 months ago
What is the method line say? Not the technique, the actual method.
comment on someone explain non-scale victory to me like I have not read a paper in years in c/progresspics · 49 points · 7 months ago
You have restated the marketing copy. What is the actual substance here.
comment on the Netherlands: area percent, and what it actually costs here in c/coa · 19 points · 8 months ago
Tested the GLB raw material and a reseller vial side-by-side. Same purity claim, different impurity profiles. Handling matters.
comment on the Netherlands: area percent, and what it actually costs here in c/coa · 45 points · 8 months ago
Tested the GLB raw material and a reseller vial side-by-side. Same purity claim, different impurity profiles. Handling matters.
comment on the Netherlands: area percent, and what it actually costs here in c/coa · 128 points · 8 months ago
the batch number or it did not happen
comment on is it normal to get injection-site soreness at week 54 in c/glp1canada · 6 points · 9 months ago
Small correction: the trial was 17 weeks, not 3. Does not change your point but people will quote it.
comment on what changed for me between week 45 and week 88 in c/coa · 50 points · 9 months ago
chromatogram or it did not happen
Disagree on that part. 93.7% and 99.3% on the same vial is normal.
comment on [Results] 82 weeks, 15kg, and progress was the hard part in c/progresspics · 1 points · 9 months ago
non-scale victories count, post them
comment on Canada vs formulary — genuinely asking which matters more in c/glp1canada · 69 points · 11 months ago
The muscle cramps was genuinely awful for three weeks and then simply stopped. I know that is not useful information, but it is what happened.
comment on [Discussion] the purity advice in here is 9 years out of date in c/coa · 1 points · 1 year ago
Cosigning. The batch number is load-bearing information.