u/salma_almeida
Contributes reviews on supplier material. Based in Leuven.
member · joined 14 May 2025
comment on [Trial Data] ATTAIN-1 numbers, and why the % is not the headline in c/orforglipron · 0 points · 3 days ago
the absorption problem is solved by non-peptide structure
comment on 19 months at maintenance. the interesting part starts after the loss stops. in c/maintenancephase · 1 points · 9 days ago
Tried the lowest-effective approach. 1.7mg worked for 6 weeks, then cravings returned. 2.5mg was the actual floor.
comment on 19 months at maintenance. the interesting part starts after the loss stops. in c/maintenancephase · -1 points · 9 days ago
The plateau is real and boring. 16 weeks at the same weight, then movement again. Patience was the intervention.
comment on [Milestone] first time in a decade my blood pressure is normal in c/progresspics · 6 points · 15 days ago
text removes the body-shaming pile-on
Yes, exactly this, and it is the bit that took me 9 weeks to accept.
comment on [Discussion] we have no vocabulary for success that is not a number going down in c/maintenancephase · -8 points · 18 days ago
nobody posts about this part and it is the longest part
comment on [Appeal] the modmail-first policy and why it exists in c/meta · 1 points · 24 days ago
This is the "correlation is mechanism" thing again.
Adding to this: disclosure is doing more work than the comment implies.
comment on ACHIEVE — my 18-week log, condensed into one table in c/orforglipron · 43 points · 24 days ago
This is correct. ATTAIN data is phase 10.
comment on [PSA] ATTAIN is not what most of this community thinks it is in c/orforglipron · 1 points · 1 months ago
the supply conversation changes if this approves
comment on [Meta] the small molecule rule is doing its job and people should stop complaining in c/orforglipron · 8 points · 2 months ago
no cold chain means ATTAIN, if approved
comment on switched from 0.25mg to 1.7mg and the constipation got better, not worse in c/maintenancephase · -3 points · 2 months ago
Did you stretch the dose interval?
comment on non-peptide: what the trials say vs what this community says in c/orforglipron · 13 points · 2 months ago
phase 10 data is interesting, phase 4 will tell the real story
comment on non-peptide: what the trials say vs what this community says in c/orforglipron · 18 points · 2 months ago
Stalled for 15 weeks, changed nothing, and it started moving again on week 35.
comment on am I the only one who found timeframe harder than the injections in c/progresspics · 23 points · 3 months ago
text only is the whole point of the community
Disagree on that part. 97.9% and 97.6% on the same vial is normal.
comment on switched from 5mg to 2.5mg and the nausea got better, not worse in c/maintenancephase · 1 points · 4 months ago
How long at maintenance?
comment on [Meta] proposal — a flair for small molecule posts in c/orforglipron · -29 points · 4 months ago
Which country? Half the answers in this thread only apply in Germany.
comment on [Meta] proposal — a flair for small molecule posts in c/orforglipron · 52 points · 4 months ago
No. This is the kind of confident post that gets copied into a screenshot and repeated for years. Where is the evidence.
comment on struggle: what the trials say vs what this community says in c/progresspics · 109 points · 4 months ago
no images, none, not even redacted ones
comment on anyone else notice research peptides kicking in around week 14 in c/researchpeptides · 19 points · 4 months ago
Which country? Half the answers in this thread only apply in France.
comment on does non-scale victory actually matter or is it forum lore at this point in c/progresspics · 152 points · 5 months ago
20 months, 31kg, non-scale victory
comment on goal weight is the most under-discussed thing in c/coldchain in c/maintenancephase · 79 points · 6 months ago
This is correct. Weight variance is normal at maintenance.