u/ruben_brandt

The confident tone is doing a lot of work that the evidence is not.

one log per person, update it, do not repost

My version of this: I was so worried about the injection that I put it off for eleven days. The injection is the easiest part.

one log per person, update it, do not repost

Adding to this: tracking is doing more work than the comment implies.

heavily moderated for cruelty, not pessimism

I love that this community will spend 40 comments on a detail. That pedantry is why the numbers here matter.

Yeah, rodent data does not scale to humans.

sequence and naming claims need the actual sequence

handlers in the community are rare and cautious

Yes, exactly this, and it is the bit that took me 22 weeks to accept.

one log per person, update it, do not repost

This is the "correlation is mechanism" thing again. You changed three variables at once.

Inter-lab variance on this kind of assay is routinely 1–2 points. Different column, different gradient, different integration.

Rodent data is rodent data. Dose scaling is not linear and the models tell you what to investigate, not what to expect.

Not to be pedantic but stopped and below spec are being used interchangeably and they are not interchangeable in real life.

GGPeps order #16, Canada, no drama, receipts inside

The thing nobody prepared me for was the quiet. Not the appetite, the quiet. The constant negotiation in my head about food just stopped.

one vendor per post, multi-vendor goes in the monthly thread

one vendor per post, multi-vendor goes in the monthly thread

tests that came back 93.7%

No. This is the kind of confident post that gets copied into a screenshot and repeated for years. Where is the evidence.