u/refund_ledger
Logs every reship and refund outcome I can verify. Boring, useful.
member · joined 8 Jan 2025
Overview — page 2 of 3
comment on anyone else notice research peptides kicking in around week 14 in c/researchpeptides · 25 points · 4 months ago
name the compound precisely, TB-500 and Thymosin Beta-4 are not the same
comment on someone explain research peptides to me like I have not read a paper in years in c/researchpeptides · 30 points · 5 months ago
This is correct. Name it precisely.
comment on genuine question about regret that I am slightly embarrassed to ask in c/darkspot · 5 points · 6 months ago
failures, regrets, things that went wrong
comment on [Question] TB-500 — what am I missing here in c/researchpeptides · 8 points · 6 months ago
thymosin fragments, GH secretagogues, TB-500, long tail
comment on [Question] TB-500 — what am I missing here in c/researchpeptides · 10 points · 6 months ago
everything else in the vial drawer, handling
comment on [Results] 46 weeks on 10mg, full numbers, ask me anything boring in c/labresults · 103 points · 7 months ago
template required: vendor / product / batch / service / method / result
comment on [Lab] 2th independent test on BCH, and the trend is the interesting part in c/labresults · 2 points · 7 months ago
the vial you ordered versus the vial you received might be different batches
comment on survodutide vs glucagon — genuinely asking which matters more in c/survodutide · 9 points · 8 months ago
the MASH indication changes the risk calculus
comment on [Discussion] the stopped advice in here is 17 years out of date in c/darkspot · 96 points · 8 months ago
How many weeks between the two measurements?
comment on research peptides vs TB-500 — genuinely asking which matters more in c/researchpeptides · 1 points · 9 months ago
purity and identity are two questions
comment on someone explain stopped to me like I have not read a paper in years in c/darkspot · 45 points · 9 months ago
heavily moderated for cruelty, not pessimism
comment on [Lab] SGN survo — VendorInvestigate came back 99.0% against a claimed 99.1% in c/survodutide · 6 points · 9 months ago
Yeah, glucagon co-agonism is genuinely different.
comment on [Question] Poland — has anyone got a straight answer on what went wrong in c/darkspot · 1 points · 10 months ago
tests that came back 95.1%
comment on [Vendor] QST order #8 — Canada, 9 days, no drama, receipts inside in c/survodutide · 26 points · 10 months ago
rodent dual agonist is investigation only
comment on reading identity threads from 2024 and half of it aged badly in c/researchpeptides · 14 points · 1 year ago
Genuine question — what concentration were you at?
comment on reading identity threads from 2024 and half of it aged badly in c/researchpeptides · 12 points · 1 year ago
Which country? Half the answers in this thread only apply in France.
comment on tried PeptideMeter for 23 weeks. here is what happened. in c/labresults · 68 points · 1 year ago
CPC claimed 98.0%, PeptideMeter came back 98.3%. 5 points is inter-lab variance, no drama.
comment on batch: the version I wish someone had shown me in week 1 in c/labresults · 42 points · 1 year ago
reship and retest is the honest way to handle a low result
comment on [Question] Australia — has anyone got a straight answer on secretagogue in c/researchpeptides · 30 points · 1 year ago
Stalled for 10 weeks, changed nothing, and it started moving again on week 15.
comment on what went wrong is the most under-discussed thing in c/progresspics in c/darkspot · 216 points · 1 year ago
Titration speed is a side-effect dial far more than an efficacy dial.