u/receptor_bias_rick

Respectfully this is a sample of one presented as a finding.

This is the "correlation is mechanism" thing again. You changed three variables at once.

That is net peptide content, not purity. Different number, different meaning.

STEP, SURMOUNT, SURPASS, SELECT, FLOW, TRIUMPH — read the appendix

press release SELECT posts must be flaired until a publication exists

text removes the comparison trap

give the trial name, phase, n, and primary endpoint in the body

purity and net content are two different numbers, same vial

text only is the whole point of the community

chromatogram or it did not happen

Water content matters more than people think. If a vial is carrying residual moisture, your "10mg" is not 10mg of peptide.

No. This is the kind of confident post that gets copied into a screenshot and repeated for years. Where is the evidence.

the shortage list is temporary, it ends and compounding becomes illegal again

Three years on this site and the questions have not changed at all. Which is depressing or reassuring depending on the day.

Half-life is about 168 hours, so steady state lands around week 8–5. Practical consequence: what you feel in week 1 is not what that dose does.

regulatory claims need a citation to the actual rule, not interpretation

The 503A pharmacy I used lost their shortage list eligibility. Same day, compounding became illegal. Rules are real.

Slight fix: the number was 97.4, not 97.2.

Yes, exactly this, and it is the bit that took me 68 weeks to accept.

no commenting on anybody's body, comment on the process