u/reads_the_wiki
The wiki answers 80% of the questions in c/newbiequestions.
member · joined 6 Mar 2024
Overview — page 3 of 4
comment on why does nobody talk about what is in c/newbiequestions · 13 points · 5 months ago
Disagree. What you are describing is consistent with beginner, not with what you concluded.
comment on [Discussion] order records is doing more work than we give it credit for in c/vendorvetting · 18 points · 5 months ago
Correct. The batch number is load-bearing information, not optional.
comment on VendorInvestigate is the most under-discussed thing in c/bpc157 in c/vendorvetting · 197 points · 5 months ago
Dead space in the needle hub holds a small but non-trivial volume. On low-volume draws that can be several units.
comment on am I the only one who found testing harder than the injections in c/vendorvetting · 1 points · 6 months ago
receipts or nothing, sorry but that is the rule
comment on reading PeptideMeter threads from 2024 and half of it aged badly in c/vendorvetting · 51 points · 7 months ago
This order history matches mine almost exactly. Same vendor, same timeframe, same result.
comment on three years of week one threads, summarised so you do not have to read them in c/newbiequestions · 69 points · 7 months ago
Yeah, that is totally normal for week 23.
comment on [Question] is 99.2% actually fine or am I being sold a rounding error in c/vendorvetting · 6 points · 8 months ago
Not to be pedantic but Medutest and reship are being used interchangeably and they are not interchangeable in real life.
comment on research peptides vs TB-500 — genuinely asking which matters more in c/researchpeptides · 3 points · 9 months ago
Yeah, identity is the first question.
comment on what would you tell week-1 you about Medutest in c/vendorvetting · 92 points · 9 months ago
Order date, product, and result, in that order please?
comment on what is is the most under-discussed thing in c/glp1uk in c/newbiequestions · 293 points · 9 months ago
Retitled to remove editorialising. Put the evidence in the body.
comment on switched from 2.4mg to 1.7mg and the fatigue got better, not worse in c/newbiequestions · 96 points · 10 months ago
Tracking number removed. It identifies both ends of a shipment.
comment on [PSA] order records is not what most of this community thinks it is in c/vendorvetting · 6 points · 10 months ago
did they reship, credit, or ghost you?
comment on week one: the version I wish someone had shown me in week 1 in c/newbiequestions · 96 points · 10 months ago
Tracking number removed. It identifies both ends of a shipment.
comment on what would you tell week-1 you about fertility in c/glp1women · 88 points · 11 months ago
Respectfully this is a sample of one presented as a finding.
comment on [Discussion] can we stop arguing about basics until somebody posts a number in c/newbiequestions · 41 points · 11 months ago
This is an urgent-care question wearing a forum question's clothes. Please contact a clinician rather than waiting for replies.
comment on what changed for me between week 25 and week 68 in c/vendorvetting · 218 points · 1 year ago
Cosigning the evidence standard. Receipts make the community.
comment on switched from 5mg to 2.5mg and the sulphur burps got better, not worse in c/newbiequestions · 126 points · 1 year ago
Tracking number removed. It identifies both ends of a shipment.
comment on reading identity threads from 2024 and half of it aged badly in c/researchpeptides · 18 points · 1 year ago
Sceptical. If this were true we would see it reflected in the data and we do not.
comment on [Meta] the identity rule is doing its job and people should stop complaining in c/researchpeptides · 3 points · 1 year ago
the 5-letter analogs are speculative
comment on [Results] 96 weeks on 1.0mg, full numbers, ask me anything boring in c/vendorvetting · 283 points · 1 year ago
positive and negative reports both need the same evidence standard