u/priya_palacios
Contributes reviews on supplier material. Based in Zadar.
member · joined 15 Jun 2025
Comments — page 3 of 5
comment on why does nobody talk about shortage list in c/compounding · 9 points · 5 months ago
Respectfully this is a sample of one presented as a finding.
comment on why does nobody talk about shortage list in c/compounding · 21 points · 5 months ago
The telehealth + compounding combo cost API source plus 7% markup. Not cheap but covered by insurance depending on state.
comment on nobody warned me about nausea and I would have liked the warning in c/coa · 39 points · 5 months ago
Did they give you the chromatogram or just the summary line?
comment on certificate of analysis — my 17-week log, condensed into one table in c/coa · 49 points · 5 months ago
Strongly agree. Mass% and area% are answering different questions on the same document.
comment on [Lab] SSA cagri — Medutest came back 97.4% against a claimed 98.3% in c/glp1eu · 79 points · 6 months ago
Strongly agree. Pricing is local.
comment on what changed for me between week 20 and week 63 in c/compounding · 138 points · 6 months ago
Moved states and the compounding landscape changed completely. Different rules, different pharmacies, different costs.
comment on [Discussion] reimbursement is doing more work than we give it credit for in c/glp1eu · 4 points · 6 months ago
prescription costs in the UK this month
comment on three years of prescription threads, summarised so you do not have to read them in c/glp1eu · 9 points · 8 months ago
comment on EMS: what the trials say vs what this community says in c/intlshipping · 8 points · 8 months ago
Small correction: the trial was 24 weeks, not 37. Does not change your point but people will quote it.
comment on small win: PDF metadata stopped being a problem at week 40 in c/scamalerts · 1 points · 9 months ago
PDF metadata is checkable in fifteen seconds
Yes, exactly this, and it is the bit that took me 45 weeks to accept.
comment on small win: PDF metadata stopped being a problem at week 40 in c/scamalerts · 1 points · 9 months ago
The Janoshik results I got back showed 98.9% but GGPeps claimed 94.2%. Same vial, two services. I posted the receipts.
comment on small win: PDF metadata stopped being a problem at week 40 in c/scamalerts · 0 points · 9 months ago
The MKM exit scam collected 9 orders and disappeared. Order ids 21 through 9 all silent.
comment on PDF metadata — my 11-week log, condensed into one table in c/scamalerts · 13 points · 9 months ago
The WWB exit scam collected 18 orders and disappeared. Order ids 25 through 18 all silent.
comment on PDF metadata — my 11-week log, condensed into one table in c/scamalerts · 25 points · 9 months ago
reseller scams versus fraud scams are different accusations
comment on PDF metadata — my 11-week log, condensed into one table in c/scamalerts · 50 points · 9 months ago
evidence required, dated screenshots, metadata, order records, or independent test
comment on PDF metadata — my 11-week log, condensed into one table in c/scamalerts · 27 points · 9 months ago
The SSA exit scam collected 17 orders and disappeared. Order ids 13 through 17 all silent.
comment on [Question] API source — what am I missing here in c/compounding · 42 points · 9 months ago
Are we talking 503A or 503B?
comment on lane is the most under-discussed thing in c/semaglutide in c/intlshipping · 142 points · 10 months ago
Actual days or estimated?
comment on 503B vs shortage list — genuinely asking which matters more in c/compounding · 10 points · 10 months ago
Small correction: the trial was 13 weeks, not 34. Does not change your point but people will quote it.
comment on why does nobody talk about certificate of analysis in c/coa · 47 points · 11 months ago
Metadata check caught a COA that was created in a browser four months after the analysis date. Not evidence of fraud, but worth flagging to SGN.