u/peptidemeter_pat
Tracks vendor-level averages over time. The trend is the signal.
member · joined 29 Apr 2024
Comments — page 2 of 5
comment on my gallbladder came out at month 7 and i would still do it again in c/sideeffects · 18 points · 21 days ago
nausea on day 2 is normal, nausea after week 19 is worth checking
comment on [Medutest] SWB sema — 98.2%, cold chain intact, 9 days transit in c/labresults · 16 points · 1 months ago
Retitled to remove editorialising. Put the evidence in the body.
comment on [Medutest] SWB sema — 98.2%, cold chain intact, 9 days transit in c/labresults · 68 points · 1 months ago
below-spec results get logged, not dismissed
comment on interval stretching is the most under-discussed thing in c/progresspics in c/tapering · 46 points · 1 months ago
tapering instructions are not welcome here
comment on [Vendor] QST order #13 — Canada, 15 days, no drama, receipts inside in c/sideeffects · 100 points · 1 months ago
The reflux passes. I kept a log and the timeline was the only useful thing. 16 weeks and it was basically gone.
comment on [Lab] SGN reta — VendorInvestigate came back 93.7% against a claimed 94.2% in c/sideeffects · 27 points · 1 months ago
Went to A&E convinced it was pancreatitis. Lipase normal. It was gallstones. Get checked, do not post and wait.
comment on A1c — my 18-week log, condensed into one table in c/bloodwork · 77 points · 1 months ago
eGFR from 19 to 37 is movement, not noise
comment on [Meta] the hair loss rule is doing its job and people should stop complaining in c/sideeffects · 118 points · 2 months ago
Every time this gets posted it hits the front page and every time someone has to re-explain it.
comment on what would you tell week-1 you about fatigue in c/sideeffects · 33 points · 2 months ago
My fatigue was worst at 1.7mg and better at 1.0mg, which makes no sense but it is real.
comment on [Discussion] the reflux advice in here is 18 years out of date in c/sideeffects · 23 points · 2 months ago
Yeah, the sulphur burps hit on day 3 for me too, not day 1.
Yes, exactly this, and it is the bit that took me 58 weeks to accept.
comment on stalled for 10 weeks at 0.5mg and I refuse to panic this time in c/bloodwork · 38 points · 2 months ago
The evidence standard in c/vendorvetting gets called too strict about once a month, and every time, the thread ends with the complainant agreeing.
comment on [Vendor] WXT order #24 — France, 29 days, no drama, receipts inside in c/glp1aus · 38 points · 3 months ago
Sceptical. If this were true we would see it reflected in the data and we do not.
comment on Medutest — 2 things I got wrong before I got it right in c/labresults · 23 points · 3 months ago
Batch number? Date of test?
comment on am I the only one who found TGA harder than the injections in c/glp1aus · 6 points · 3 months ago
Titration speed is a side-effect dial far more than an efficacy dial.
comment on [Discussion] we are measuring PeptideMeter at the wrong time and calling it noise in c/labresults · 140 points · 3 months ago
This is an urgent-care question wearing a forum question's clothes. Please contact a clinician rather than waiting for replies.
comment on [Question] PeptideMeter — what am I missing here in c/labresults · 0 points · 3 months ago
sample of one, say so
comment on [Results] 31 weeks on 1.7mg, full numbers, ask me anything boring in c/customs · 7 points · 4 months ago
the 17mg import allowance is Denmark-specific
comment on my A1c moved and I cannot work out whether Australia is why in c/glp1aus · 7 points · 4 months ago
Small correction: the trial was 11 weeks, not 38. Does not change your point but people will quote it.
comment on [Question] import — what am I missing here in c/customs · 2 points · 4 months ago
The confident tone is doing a lot of work that the evidence is not.
comment on does A1c actually matter or is it forum lore at this point in c/bloodwork · 30 points · 5 months ago
Disagree but this is the good kind of wrong — it is specific enough to be checked.