u/oskar_kaufmann

Titration speed is a side-effect dial far more than an efficacy dial.

This is correct. 1mL versus 15mL is the common mistake.

Yeah, showing the arithmetic is the fastest way for someone to spot the error.

This is correct. Long-term logs matter.

Edit to your parent would help — the concentration you quoted assumes one scenario and you have written another above it.

the the Netherlands answer is not the the Netherlands answer

Came off after 51 weeks for financial reasons. Regained about a third over the following year. Back on now at a much lower dose.

Slight fix: the number was 98.1, not 98.0.

Adding to this: jurisdiction is doing more work than the comment implies.

provincial formularies differ sharply

the 74 week mark is where it gets interesting

Dead space in the needle hub holds a small but non-trivial volume. On low-volume draws that can be several units.

appeal letter templates are in the wiki

okay but what dose of sema are you on

Yeah, the denial code matters, it tells you what to fight.

okay but what dose of sema are you on

step therapy documentation is the weapon, use it

The confident tone is doing a lot of work that the evidence is not.

Week 7 for me and the honest summary is: 35kg down, sulphur burps manageable, and I have thought about food maybe four times today.

Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.

Cosigning.

Adding to this: mg/mL is doing more work than the comment implies.

Do you have an import allowance in your jurisdiction?