u/old_account_2023
Been here since the first week. It was 40 people and a wiki stub.
long-standing contributor · joined 11 Aug 2023
Comments — page 2 of 3
comment on dose stretching — 7 things I got wrong before I got it right in c/maintenancephase · 44 points · 4 months ago
The plateau is real and boring. 10 weeks at the same weight, then movement again. Patience was the intervention.
comment on dose stretching — 7 things I got wrong before I got it right in c/maintenancephase · 22 points · 4 months ago
lowest effective dose is lowest effective dose, find it or stay higher
comment on dose stretching — 7 things I got wrong before I got it right in c/maintenancephase · 195 points · 4 months ago
regain after taper is expected, plan for it
comment on anyone else notice survodutide kicking in around week 9 in c/survodutide · -27 points · 5 months ago
The thing nobody prepared me for was the quiet. Not the appetite, the quiet. The constant negotiation in my head about food just stopped.
comment on anyone else notice survodutide kicking in around week 9 in c/survodutide · 30 points · 5 months ago
The thing nobody prepared me for was the quiet. Not the appetite, the quiet. The constant negotiation in my head about food just stopped.
comment on anyone else notice survodutide kicking in around week 9 in c/survodutide · 48 points · 5 months ago
My version of this: I was so worried about the injection that I put it off for eleven days. The injection is the easiest part.
comment on someone explain research peptides to me like I have not read a paper in years in c/researchpeptides · 41 points · 5 months ago
Stalled for 4 weeks, changed nothing, and it started moving again on week 27.
comment on goal weight: the version I wish someone had shown me in week 1 in c/maintenancephase · 7 points · 6 months ago
food noise returns but not always immediately
comment on [Lab] 19th independent test on BCH, and the trend is the interesting part in c/survodutide · 7 points · 6 months ago
Strongly agree. The safety story is separate.
comment on [Discussion] the MASH advice in here is 3 years out of date in c/survodutide · 5 points · 7 months ago
Half-life is about 168 hours, so steady state lands around week 16–5. Practical consequence: what you feel in week 1 is not what that dose does.
comment on small win: TB-500 stopped being a problem at week 21 in c/researchpeptides · 7 points · 7 months ago
The confident tone is doing a lot of work that the evidence is not.
comment on survodutide vs glucagon — genuinely asking which matters more in c/survodutide · 12 points · 8 months ago
the safety profile is not just tirzepatide amplified
comment on disclosure is the most under-discussed thing in c/maintenancephase in c/meta · 52 points · 8 months ago
Yeah, the evidence standard works.
comment on the MASH question that gets asked weekly, answered properly in c/survodutide · 1 points · 8 months ago
Edit to your parent would help — the concentration you quoted assumes one scenario and you have written another above it.
comment on the MASH question that gets asked weekly, answered properly in c/survodutide · 0 points · 8 months ago
Strongly agree. The safety story is separate.
comment on the normal thing finally clicked for me and I want to write it down in c/newbiequestions · 53 points · 9 months ago
I love that this community will spend 40 comments on a detail.
Disagree on that part. 93.7% and 99.3% on the same vial is normal.
comment on [Lab] SGN survo — VendorInvestigate came back 99.0% against a claimed 99.1% in c/survodutide · 143 points · 9 months ago
This is correct. Do not generalise from tirzepatide.
comment on what is is the most under-discussed thing in c/glp1uk in c/newbiequestions · 54 points · 9 months ago
That is net peptide content, not purity. Different number, different meaning.
comment on goal weight — 17 things I got wrong before I got it right in c/maintenancephase · 23 points · 10 months ago
How long at maintenance?
comment on [Question] Ireland — has anyone got a straight answer on rules in c/meta · 44 points · 10 months ago
Disagree but this is the good kind of wrong — it is specific enough to be checked.