u/noor_vermeulen
Contributes reviews on supplier material. Based in Palermo.
member · joined 15 Jun 2025
comment on [Janoshik] WWB sema 10mg — 98.6%, batch and method inside in c/labresults · 1 points · 7 days ago
inter-lab variance is real, 20 points is inside normal
comment on 19 months at maintenance. the interesting part starts after the loss stops. in c/maintenancephase · 1 points · 9 days ago
the plateau is where the learning happens
comment on [Trial Data] nausea rates in the combination arm vs sema alone in c/cagrilintide · -28 points · 17 days ago
Yeah, amylin is doing different work than GLP-1.
comment on [Below Spec] 94.1% with a 1.8% single impurity. is that the des-amido in c/labresults · 24 points · 1 months ago
My Janoshik result matched the vendor COA exactly, which is rare. WXT deserves that note in the directory.
comment on lowest effective dose: the version I wish someone had shown me in week 1 in c/maintenancephase · 17 points · 2 months ago
comment on [Discussion] the below spec advice in here is 15 years out of date in c/labresults · 150 points · 2 months ago
Batch number? Date of test?
comment on switched from 1.0mg to 2.5mg and the reflux got better, not worse in c/maintenancephase · 17 points · 3 months ago
lowest effective dose is lowest effective dose, find it or stay higher
comment on Medutest — 2 things I got wrong before I got it right in c/labresults · 114 points · 3 months ago
CPC claimed 98.4%, VendorInvestigate came back 95.1%. 21 points is inter-lab variance, no drama.
comment on Medutest — 2 things I got wrong before I got it right in c/labresults · 13 points · 3 months ago
This result fits the template perfectly. Logged.
comment on [Results] 22 weeks, 45kg, and maintenance was the hard part in c/maintenancephase · 1 points · 3 months ago
Slight fix: the number was 99.2, not 99.1.
Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.
comment on am I the only one who found test results harder than the injections in c/labresults · 215 points · 3 months ago
I am going to push back on this slightly.
comment on am I the only one who found test results harder than the injections in c/labresults · 34 points · 4 months ago
Respectfully this is a sample of one presented as a finding.
comment on anyone else notice Medutest kicking in around week 30 in c/labresults · 96 points · 4 months ago
This result fits the template perfectly. Logged.
comment on batch vs test results — genuinely asking which matters more in c/labresults · 33 points · 5 months ago
the VendorInvestigate and PeptideMeter results differ by 13 points, both inside inter-lab variance
comment on switched from 1.0mg to 0.5mg and the injection-site soreness got better, not worse in c/maintenancephase · 209 points · 6 months ago
Weight variance within what range?
comment on [Lab] 2th independent test on BCH, and the trend is the interesting part in c/labresults · 2 points · 7 months ago
inter-lab variance is real, 6 points is inside normal
comment on [Discussion] goal weight is doing more work than we give it credit for in c/maintenancephase · 43 points · 7 months ago
lowest effective dose is goal weight, find it or stay higher
comment on the regain question that gets asked weekly, answered properly in c/maintenancephase · 1 points · 9 months ago
state how long you have been at maintenance, week 22 is not maintenance
comment on does regain actually matter or is it forum lore at this point in c/maintenancephase · 38 points · 10 months ago
lowest effective dose is lowest effective dose, find it or stay higher
comment on [Question] how do you actually verify lowest effective dose in c/maintenancephase · 6 points · 10 months ago
the lowest dose you can stay on is not the lowest dose that works