u/nnt_nate
Number needed to treat, or I am not interested.
member · joined 6 May 2024
Comments — page 3 of 5
comment on [Vendor] WXT order #19 — Germany, 7 days, no drama, receipts inside in c/maintenancephase · 1 points · 8 months ago
dose-stretching experiences welcome, dose-stretching instructions are not
comment on someone explain appeal to me like I have not read a paper in years in c/insurancefights · 10 points · 9 months ago
Did you get step therapy or outright denial?
comment on tried PCOS for 16 weeks. here is what happened. in c/glp1women · 105 points · 9 months ago
pregnancy and trying-to-conceive get clinician pointer, not community advice
comment on [PSA] ALT is not what most of this community thinks it is in c/bloodwork · 97 points · 9 months ago
Same lab both times?
comment on goal weight — 17 things I got wrong before I got it right in c/maintenancephase · 34 points · 10 months ago
Weight variance within what range?
comment on goal weight — 17 things I got wrong before I got it right in c/maintenancephase · 91 points · 10 months ago
Weight variance within what range?
comment on goal weight — 17 things I got wrong before I got it right in c/maintenancephase · 45 points · 10 months ago
food noise returns but not always immediately
comment on [Question] how do you actually verify lowest effective dose in c/maintenancephase · 14 points · 10 months ago
weight moves within 3kg and that is normal
comment on LC-MS: the version I wish someone had shown me in week 1 in c/hplc · 111 points · 10 months ago
two labs, two different baselines, two different purity numbers, both honest
comment on [Lab] SGN sema — VendorInvestigate came back 93.7% against a claimed 98.6% in c/bloodwork · 0 points · 11 months ago
eGFR noise on rapid loss is real. 3 week noise, 10 week trend. Do not panic at week 55.
comment on ApoB is the most under-discussed thing in c/glp1science in c/bloodwork · 237 points · 11 months ago
eGFR noise during rapid loss is expected
comment on contraception — my 11-week log, condensed into one table in c/glp1women · -36 points · 11 months ago
contraception interaction claims need citation
comment on anyone else notice regain kicking in around week 90 in c/maintenancephase · 190 points · 12 months ago
Dead space in the needle hub holds a small but non-trivial volume. On low-volume draws that can be several units.
comment on [Vendor] WXT order #10 — the Netherlands, 23 days, no drama, receipts inside in c/maintenancephase · 10 points · 1 year ago
dose-stretching experiences welcome, dose-stretching instructions are not
comment on [Meta] the maintenance rule is doing its job and people should stop complaining in c/maintenancephase · 0 points · 1 year ago
Tried the lowest-effective approach. 2.4mg worked for 9 weeks, then cravings returned. 5mg was the actual floor.
comment on [Meta] the maintenance rule is doing its job and people should stop complaining in c/maintenancephase · 4 points · 1 year ago
[removed by moderator]
Disagree on that part. 98.1% and 99.0% on the same vial is normal.
comment on [Meta] the maintenance rule is doing its job and people should stop complaining in c/maintenancephase · 11 points · 1 year ago
Tried the lowest-effective approach. 2.4mg worked for 4 weeks, then cravings returned. 1.0mg was the actual floor.
comment on tried method development for 12 weeks. here is what happened. in c/hplc · 1 points · 1 year ago
related substances are where the story lives, not the main peak
comment on unpopular opinion: cycle is massively overrated in c/glp1women · 87 points · 1 year ago
fertility signal is there but unclear
comment on week 96 check-in — 26kg down, fatigue manageable, one thing confusing me in c/hplc · 19 points · 1 year ago
a round-robin on baseline integration would be genuinely useful
Disagree on that part. 93.7% and 99.3% on the same vial is normal.