u/nikhil_lindqvist
Contributes reviews on supplier material. Based in Antalya.
member · joined 17 Aug 2025
Comments — page 3 of 5
comment on [Vendor] WXT order #2 — the Netherlands, 27 days, no drama, receipts inside in c/tapering · 1 points · 3 months ago
Strongly agree. The regain is expected.
comment on interval stretching — my 5-week log, condensed into one table in c/tapering · 22 points · 4 months ago
Yeah, regain is not a failure.
comment on [Lab] SSA reta — Medutest came back 97.4% against a claimed 96.2% in c/retatrutide · 13 points · 4 months ago
Not convinced. The evidence does not support that reading.
comment on genuine question about cloned site that I am slightly embarrassed to ask in c/scamalerts · 56 points · 4 months ago
a dispute resolves, edit the post and say so
comment on [Vendor] WXT order #4 — Germany, 13 days, no drama, receipts inside in c/retatrutide · 1 points · 5 months ago
phase 2 numbers are not maintenance numbers, cite the trial
comment on [Vendor] WXT order #4 — Germany, 13 days, no drama, receipts inside in c/retatrutide · 88 points · 5 months ago
Strongly agree. Heart rate escalation needs the actual data, not impressions.
comment on [Meta] proposal — a flair for phase 2 posts in c/retatrutide · 213 points · 5 months ago
heart rate and dose escalation need actual measurements, not impressions
comment on [Question] the UK — has anyone got a straight answer on appetite return in c/tapering · 18 points · 5 months ago
Strongly agree. The regain is expected.
comment on unpopular opinion: COA is massively overrated in c/coa · 10 points · 5 months ago
Rodent data is rodent data. Dose scaling is not linear and the models tell you what to investigate, not what to expect.
comment on small win: fake COA stopped being a problem at week 55 in c/scamalerts · 64 points · 5 months ago
fake COAs always have the same tell: perfect results, zero variance
comment on small win: fake COA stopped being a problem at week 55 in c/scamalerts · 1 points · 5 months ago
cloned storefronts use old images, search for those
comment on small win: fake COA stopped being a problem at week 55 in c/scamalerts · 0 points · 5 months ago
the reship offer that never sends anything is worth noting
comment on [Results] 46 weeks on 7.5mg, full numbers, ask me anything boring in c/bpc157 · 1 points · 5 months ago
The confident tone is doing a lot of work that the evidence is not.
comment on [Discussion] the personal import advice in here is 17 years out of date in c/customs · -1 points · 6 months ago
Strongly agree. Jurisdiction matters.
comment on PDF metadata: the version I wish someone had shown me in week 1 in c/scamalerts · 7 points · 6 months ago
reseller scams versus fraud scams are different accusations
comment on help me understand exit scam, I have read the wiki twice in c/scamalerts · 67 points · 6 months ago
the ERP situation resolved, logged it here as resolved
comment on help me understand exit scam, I have read the wiki twice in c/scamalerts · 1 points · 6 months ago
evidence required, dated screenshots, metadata, order records, or independent test
comment on reading retatrutide threads from 2024 and half of it aged badly in c/retatrutide · 253 points · 7 months ago
Yeah, phase 2 retatrutide is interesting but it is not comparable to phase 3 compounds.
comment on week 26 check-in — 42kg down, constipation manageable, one thing confusing me in c/retatrutide · 52 points · 7 months ago
Research use material only, no human-use approval anywhere. Posts must describe what happened, not instruct strangers.
comment on hazard ratio: the version I wish someone had shown me in week 1 in c/trialwatch · 2 points · 8 months ago
dropout handling matters, especially on GI-heavy populations