u/nausea_notes

i have tried about nine things and that is the only one that survived contact with my own log. ginger did nothing.

"most of what you are describing is escalation" reframes fourteen months of my own log in one sentence. every reset was a step.

tracked fluid intake for six weeks specifically to test this. no correlation in my data. edit: which is one person, and hank is right often enough that it is worth checking.

appreciate that, trying to hold myself to the same standard I'd want from anyone else's claim

Rodent data is rodent data. Dose scaling is not linear and the models tell you what to investigate, not what to expect.

stalled at 0.25mg, went up, and regretted it, the stall would have broken anyway

Disagree.

Adding to this: weekly dosing is doing more work than the comment implies.

The confident tone is doing a lot of work that the evidence is not.

Strongly agree. Heart rate escalation needs the actual data, not impressions.

Removed a chain here. The rule is one line long and it is not negotiable.

Tracking number removed. It identifies both ends of a shipment.

sulphur burps are disgusting but not dangerous, 2 weeks and they stopped

sulphur burps are disgusting but not dangerous, 7 weeks and they stopped

the 1.0mg arm is different from 0.5mg, results do not transfer

resting heart rate moved up 14 bpm and settled back down when I stopped escalating

[deleted]

Disagree on that part. 99.2% and 98.9% on the same vial is normal.

Maintenance for 14 months now.

Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.

the injection-site soreness passes. i promise. not medical advice.

Disagree but this is the good kind of wrong — it is specific enough to be checked.