u/naomi_erdogan
Contributes reviews on supplier material. Based in Bochum.
member · joined 14 May 2025
Comments — page 2 of 5
comment on tried meta for 12 weeks. here is what happened. in c/meta · 6 points · 2 months ago
the 13 month rule change is in effect
comment on tried meta for 12 weeks. here is what happened. in c/meta · 32 points · 2 months ago
My version of this: I was so worried about the injection that I put it off for eleven days. The injection is the easiest part.
comment on unpopular opinion: nausea is massively overrated in c/sideeffects · 21 points · 2 months ago
severe abdominal pain is an urgent-care question, not a forum question
Disagree on that part. 97.4% and 98.9% on the same vial is normal.
comment on help me understand gallbladder, I have read the wiki twice in c/sideeffects · 29 points · 3 months ago
Has anything else changed? Sleep, food, protein, anything?
comment on [Discussion] can we stop arguing about wiki until somebody posts a number in c/meta · 1 points · 4 months ago
moderation appeals go through modmail first
comment on genuine question about cloned site that I am slightly embarrassed to ask in c/scamalerts · 4 points · 4 months ago
Mechanistically the bit that matters is PDF metadata. It explains most of the early profile and a decent chunk of the outcome.
comment on [Results] 22 weeks, 30kg, and EU was the hard part in c/glp1eu · 1 points · 5 months ago
apotheke, receta, EMA — twenty-seven different answers
comment on [Discussion] we are measuring wiki at the wrong time and calling it noise in c/meta · 47 points · 5 months ago
rule-change proposals need concrete wording
comment on unpopular opinion: gallbladder is massively overrated in c/sideeffects · 140 points · 5 months ago
IANAD and neither is anyone upvoting this
comment on why does nobody talk about shortage list in c/compounding · 69 points · 5 months ago
Yeah, 503A and 503B are different regulatory animals.
comment on three years of rules threads, summarised so you do not have to read them in c/meta · 27 points · 5 months ago
the periodic argument about moderation standards
comment on three years of rules threads, summarised so you do not have to read them in c/meta · 3 points · 5 months ago
Edit to your parent would help — the concentration you quoted assumes one scenario and you have written another above it.
comment on reading retatrutide threads from 2024 and half of it aged badly in c/retatrutide · 136 points · 7 months ago
TRIUMPH data is phase 2, not phase 3, smaller n and shorter
comment on [Question] 503B — what am I missing here in c/compounding · 5 points · 7 months ago
Strongly agree. API source transparency matters.
comment on three years of group buy threads, summarised so you do not have to read them in c/scamalerts · 10 points · 7 months ago
Dated screenshot or is this from memory?
comment on three years of group buy threads, summarised so you do not have to read them in c/scamalerts · 1 points · 7 months ago
The VendorInvestigate results I got back showed 93.7% but QSC claimed 95.1%. Same vial, two services. I posted the receipts.
comment on three years of group buy threads, summarised so you do not have to read them in c/scamalerts · -28 points · 7 months ago
The practical rule people converge on is 28 days at fridge temperature after first puncture, and that comes from the preservative, not the peptide.
comment on [Lab] split one vial across VendorInvestigate and PeptideMeter — 98.0% and 98.4% in c/sideeffects · 0 points · 7 months ago
resting heart rate moved up 24 bpm and settled back down when I stopped escalating
comment on [Meta] proposal — a flair for 503B posts in c/compounding · 7 points · 8 months ago
telehealth costs state board plus compounding markup, total varies
comment on [Meta] proposal — a flair for 503B posts in c/compounding · 7 points · 8 months ago
503B compounding is different from 503A, different rules, different legality