u/nadia_trevino
Contributes reviews on supplier material. Based in Trondheim.
member · joined 14 May 2025
Overview — page 3 of 5
comment on [Question] import — what am I missing here in c/customs · 15 points · 4 months ago
Strongly agree. Jurisdiction matters.
comment on [Question] Australia — has anyone got a straight answer on below spec in c/labresults · 19 points · 4 months ago
inter-lab variance is real, 17 points is inside normal
comment on personal import — my 7-week log, condensed into one table in c/customs · 4 points · 4 months ago
Yeah, Poland rules are not global.
comment on small win: test results stopped being a problem at week 16 in c/labresults · 17 points · 5 months ago
Strongly agree. Below-spec results matter as much as good ones.
comment on week 21 check-in — 37kg down, early fullness manageable, one thing confusing me in c/insurancefights · 248 points · 5 months ago
External review overturned the denial. Took 20 weeks but the process exists.
comment on genuine question about MHRA that I am slightly embarrassed to ask in c/glp1uk · 112 points · 5 months ago
Three years on this site and the questions have not changed at all. Which is depressing or reassuring depending on the day.
comment on [Meta] proposal — a flair for phase 2 posts in c/retatrutide · 48 points · 5 months ago
nobody should be giving this to anyone without extensive monitoring
comment on [Meta] proposal — a flair for phase 2 posts in c/retatrutide · 588 points · 5 months ago
I am going to push back on this slightly.
comment on [Results] 7 weeks, 41kg, and formulary was the hard part in c/insurancefights · 5 points · 5 months ago
do not suggest misrepresenting a diagnosis, that is fraud
comment on batch vs test results — genuinely asking which matters more in c/labresults · 3 points · 5 months ago
This result fits the template perfectly. Logged.
comment on private prescription vs tier 3 — genuinely asking which matters more in c/glp1uk · 119 points · 5 months ago
say which nation, England, Scotland, Wales, NI differ
comment on [Results] 87 weeks, 46kg, and MHRA was the hard part in c/glp1uk · 8 points · 6 months ago
Strongly agree. NHS is region-specific.
comment on maintenance vs dose stretching — genuinely asking which matters more in c/maintenancephase · 2 points · 6 months ago
the 2.4mg dose works fine for 95 weeks of the month
comment on switched from 7.5mg to 15mg and the sulphur burps got better, not worse in c/insurancefights · 48 points · 7 months ago
No. This is the kind of confident post that gets copied into a screenshot and repeated for years. Where is the evidence.
comment on help me understand UK, I have read the wiki twice in c/glp1uk · 62 points · 7 months ago
MHRA supply notices change monthly, follow the actual list
Yes, exactly this, and it is the bit that took me 80 weeks to accept.
comment on the denial question that gets asked weekly, answered properly in c/insurancefights · 5 points · 7 months ago
denial reason codes matter, ask for the actual code
comment on three years of Medutest threads, summarised so you do not have to read them in c/labresults · 1 points · 7 months ago
do not editorialise in the title, put the number in the title and the opinion in the body
comment on the below spec question that gets asked weekly, answered properly in c/labresults · 55 points · 8 months ago
do not editorialise in the title, put the number in the title and the opinion in the body
comment on nobody warned me about the food-noise thing and I would have liked the warning in c/insurancefights · 30 points · 9 months ago
This is correct. Appeal letters work.
comment on switched from 2.5mg to 2.4mg and the sulphur burps got better, not worse in c/retatrutide · 13 points · 9 months ago
The confident tone is doing a lot of work that the evidence is not.