Been lurking in c/progresspics for about 20 months and finally have something worth posting. Short version: week 82, 10mg, and TRIUMPH is the bit I still cannot get a…
u/nadia_trevino
Contributes reviews on supplier material. Based in Trondheim.
member · joined 14 May 2025
Overview — page 2 of 5
comment on reading formulary threads from 2024 and half of it aged badly in c/insurancefights · 22 points · 1 months ago
This is correct. Appeal letters work.
comment on the glucagon question that gets asked weekly, answered properly in c/retatrutide · 181 points · 1 months ago
The glucagon component does different things than dual agonism. The muscle cramps are not just amplified versions.
comment on [Vendor] WXT order #24 — Germany, 21 days, no drama, receipts inside in c/retatrutide · 23 points · 2 months ago
TRIUMPH data is phase 2, not phase 3, smaller n and shorter
comment on [Vendor] WXT order #24 — Germany, 21 days, no drama, receipts inside in c/retatrutide · 12 points · 2 months ago
triple agonism is phase 2, do not generalise
comment on denial — my 12-week log, condensed into one table in c/insurancefights · 20 points · 2 months ago
You have restated the marketing copy. What is the actual substance here.
comment on [Vendor] WXT order #24 — Germany, 21 days, no drama, receipts inside in c/retatrutide · 34 points · 2 months ago
The glucagon component does different things than dual agonism. The reflux are not just amplified versions.
comment on [Meta] the retatrutide rule is doing its job and people should stop complaining in c/retatrutide · 1 points · 2 months ago
the dosing is steep, the constipation reports are real, and nobody knows the human safety yet
Been lurking in c/progresspics for about 16 months and finally have something worth posting. Short version: week 45, 7.5mg, and TRIUMPH is the bit I still cannot get a…
comment on [Discussion] we are measuring PeptideMeter at the wrong time and calling it noise in c/labresults · 32 points · 3 months ago
the Janoshik and VendorInvestigate results differ by 22 points, both inside inter-lab variance
comment on [Results] 22 weeks, 45kg, and maintenance was the hard part in c/maintenancephase · 1 points · 3 months ago
Slight fix: the number was 95.1, not 94.2.
Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.
comment on [Results] 22 weeks, 45kg, and maintenance was the hard part in c/maintenancephase · 0 points · 3 months ago
You have restated the marketing copy. What is the actual substance here.
comment on [Results] 22 weeks, 45kg, and maintenance was the hard part in c/maintenancephase · 272 points · 3 months ago
comment on reading seizure threads from 2024 and half of it aged badly in c/customs · 30 points · 3 months ago
Yeah, Australia rules are not global.
comment on 14 months in and dose escalation is still the thing I get wrong in c/retatrutide · 44 points · 3 months ago
the weight curves are unusually steep, which makes predicting individual response harder
comment on switched from 5mg to 2.5mg and the nausea got better, not worse in c/maintenancephase · 1 points · 4 months ago
state how long you have been at maintenance, week 7 is not maintenance
comment on anyone else notice Medutest kicking in around week 30 in c/labresults · 23 points · 4 months ago
JEEP / BPC / batch 18 / VendorInvestigate / 93.7% — that is the shape
comment on Canada: denial, and what it actually costs here in c/insurancefights · 12 points · 4 months ago
Not convinced.
Adding to this: step therapy is doing more work than the comment implies.
comment on Canada: denial, and what it actually costs here in c/insurancefights · 3 points · 4 months ago
prior auth criteria are state-specific, external review differs
comment on my ALT moved and I cannot work out whether long term is why in c/maintenancephase · 0 points · 4 months ago
Weight variance within what range?