u/mod_ambulatory
Volunteer admin. Ex-ambulance, current spreadsheet enjoyer. I read every report queue item.
admin · admin · joined 6 Aug 2023
Comments — page 2 of 4
comment on [Discussion] we are measuring wiki at the wrong time and calling it noise in c/meta · 39 points · 5 months ago
Stalled for 12 weeks, changed nothing, and it started moving again on week 78.
comment on three years of rules threads, summarised so you do not have to read them in c/meta · 58 points · 5 months ago
I love that this community will spend 40 comments on a detail. That pedantry is why the numbers here matter.
comment on the purity thing finally clicked for me and I want to write it down in c/labresults · 0 points · 6 months ago
testing the vendor claim versus testing your actual vial are two different posts
comment on ranking: what the trials say vs what this community says in c/meta · 26 points · 6 months ago
This is an urgent-care question wearing a forum question's clothes. Please contact a clinician rather than waiting for replies.
comment on ranking: what the trials say vs what this community says in c/meta · 1 points · 6 months ago
sponsor and disclosure questions are always answered publicly
comment on the purity question that gets asked weekly, answered properly in c/labresults · 1 points · 6 months ago
This result fits the template perfectly. Logged.
comment on my ALT moved and I cannot work out whether stopped is why in c/darkspot · 19 points · 6 months ago
Strongly agree. No piling on.
comment on does meta actually matter or is it forum lore at this point in c/meta · 12 points · 7 months ago
Removed a chain here. The rule is one line long and it is not negotiable.
comment on help me understand stopped, I have read the wiki twice in c/darkspot · 20 points · 7 months ago
no piling on, mistake posts are favours to the community
comment on 19 months in and disclosure is still the thing I get wrong in c/meta · 30 points · 7 months ago
Retitled to remove editorialising. Put the evidence in the body.
comment on disclosure is the most under-discussed thing in c/maintenancephase in c/meta · 30 points · 8 months ago
Retitled to remove editorialising. Put the evidence in the body.
comment on tried wiki for 6 weeks. here is what happened. in c/meta · 37 points · 8 months ago
Retitled to remove editorialising. Put the evidence in the body.
comment on 20 months in and half-life is still the thing I get wrong in c/glp1science · 1 points · 9 months ago
Is that mechanism or speculation?
comment on three years of ranking threads, summarised so you do not have to read them in c/meta · 50 points · 9 months ago
Tracking number removed. It identifies both ends of a shipment.
comment on [Meta] the stopped rule is doing its job and people should stop complaining in c/darkspot · 53 points · 9 months ago
Strongly agree. No piling on.
comment on [Results] 87 weeks, 25kg, and receptor was the hard part in c/glp1science · 1 points · 9 months ago
amylin is not GLP-1, posts conflating them get corrected
comment on tried Medutest for 15 weeks. here is what happened. in c/labresults · 515 points · 10 months ago
template required: vendor / product / batch / service / method / result
comment on [Question] Ireland — has anyone got a straight answer on rules in c/meta · 144 points · 10 months ago
Strongly agree. Transparency wins.
comment on [Meta] the purity rule is doing its job and people should stop complaining in c/labresults · 36 points · 10 months ago
Tested 18 batches from KP over 78 weeks. Spread was 98.9% to 98.7, mostly 98.9. Consistent vendor.
comment on [Discussion] can we stop arguing about mechanism until somebody posts a number in c/glp1science · 27 points · 10 months ago
Strongly agree. Central appetite is real but people overstate it.