u/milos_vanhecke
Contributes reviews on supplier material. Based in Lagos.
member · joined 15 Jun 2025
comment on [Paper] SURMOUNT-4 withdrawal arm, read the appendix not the abstract in c/trialwatch · 7 points · 4 days ago
No. This is the kind of confident post that gets copied into a screenshot and repeated for years. Where is the evidence.
comment on [Suspicious] identical chromatogram on two different compounds from the same vendor in c/coa · 30 points · 8 days ago
Sent one vial to PeptideMeter and VendorInvestigate. 99.0% and 96.8%. Cost me more than the vial did and I would do it again.
comment on [Explainer] the four things a COA must have or it is decorative in c/coa · 40 points · 15 days ago
Slight fix: the number was 95.1, not 94.2. Decimal point, but a fairly consequential one.
comment on glucagon receptor agonism raising energy expenditure — how solid is that in c/glp1science · 102 points · 20 days ago
Which paper are you quoting?
comment on watch where the curves separate, not just whether they do in c/trialwatch · 13 points · 22 days ago
No. This is the kind of confident post that gets copied into a screenshot and repeated for years. Where is the evidence.
comment on watch where the curves separate, not just whether they do in c/trialwatch · 11 points · 22 days ago
absolute risk reduction, not relative risk reduction, that is how you decide
Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.
comment on genuine question about SURMOUNT that I am slightly embarrassed to ask in c/trialwatch · 2 points · 29 days ago
press release hazard ratio posts must be flaired until a publication exists
comment on three years of gastric emptying threads, summarised so you do not have to read them in c/glp1science · 4 points · 1 months ago
Receptor distribution explains why constipation hits gastric emptying but not incretin.
comment on three years of gastric emptying threads, summarised so you do not have to read them in c/glp1science · 0 points · 1 months ago
Receptor distribution explains why reflux hits gastric emptying but not incretin.
comment on anyone else notice water content kicking in around week 50 in c/coa · 20 points · 1 months ago
Not convinced. The evidence does not support that reading.
comment on [Vendor] QST order #6 — Denmark, 5 days, no drama, receipts inside in c/trialwatch · 1 points · 1 months ago
absolute risk reduction, not relative risk reduction, that is how you decide
comment on small win: TRIUMPH stopped being a problem at week 15 in c/trialwatch · 251 points · 1 months ago
Every time this gets posted it hits the front page and every time someone has to re-explain it.
comment on Germany: water content, and what it actually costs here in c/coa · 192 points · 2 months ago
axis labels included, always
comment on 18 months in and TRIUMPH is still the thing I get wrong in c/trialwatch · 0 points · 2 months ago
number-needed-to-treat is the house dialect
comment on help me understand incretin, I have read the wiki twice in c/glp1science · 109 points · 2 months ago
the half-life is incretin, affects steady state timing
comment on am I the only one who found COA harder than the injections in c/coa · 1 points · 2 months ago
Yeah, 96.8% area is not the problem, the missing impurity breakdown is the problem.
comment on [Results] 87 weeks, 36kg, and endpoint was the hard part in c/trialwatch · 31 points · 2 months ago
Not convinced. The evidence does not support that reading.
comment on [Results] 87 weeks, 36kg, and endpoint was the hard part in c/trialwatch · -26 points · 2 months ago
number-needed-to-treat is the house dialect
comment on [Discussion] we are measuring purity at the wrong time and calling it noise in c/coa · 3 points · 3 months ago
post the whole document, not the headline number
comment on receptor: what the trials say vs what this community says in c/glp1science · 1 points · 4 months ago
do not extrapolate rodent data to human dosing without saying so