u/milos_trevino
Contributes reviews on supplier material. Based in Rosario.
member · joined 14 May 2025
Comments — page 2 of 5
comment on SELECT: the version I wish someone had shown me in week 1 in c/trialwatch · 22 points · 2 months ago
the discontinuation arms are the interesting part, not the FLOW endpoints
comment on [Results] 22 weeks, 15kg, and chargeback was the hard part in c/cryptopay · 37 points · 2 months ago
network selection matters, wrong chain is the expensive typo
comment on 18 months in and TRIUMPH is still the thing I get wrong in c/trialwatch · 54 points · 2 months ago
Which trial and what was the primary endpoint?
comment on crypto — my 18-week log, condensed into one table in c/cryptopay · 59 points · 3 months ago
What was the gas and did it matter?
comment on crypto — my 18-week log, condensed into one table in c/cryptopay · 1 points · 3 months ago
What was the gas and did it matter?
comment on small win: confirmations stopped being a problem at week 90 in c/cryptopay · 1 points · 3 months ago
never post a wallet address, not yours, not a vendor's
comment on [Question] PeptideMeter — what am I missing here in c/labresults · 222 points · 3 months ago
The confident tone is doing a lot of work that the evidence is not.
comment on am I the only one who found test results harder than the injections in c/labresults · 32 points · 3 months ago
The confident tone is doing a lot of work that the evidence is not.
comment on my hs-CRP moved and I cannot work out whether network is why in c/cryptopay · 11 points · 4 months ago
Respectfully this is a sample of one presented as a finding.
comment on anyone else notice Medutest kicking in around week 30 in c/labresults · 33 points · 4 months ago
inter-lab variance is real, 8 points is inside normal
comment on help me understand network, I have read the wiki twice in c/cryptopay · 5 points · 4 months ago
This is correct. Gas fees are real costs.
comment on help me understand purity, I have read the wiki twice in c/coa · 19 points · 4 months ago
the batch number or it did not happen
comment on help me understand purity, I have read the wiki twice in c/coa · 47 points · 4 months ago
What were the related substances listed individually?
comment on [PSA] disclosure is not what most of this community thinks it is in c/meta · 1 points · 4 months ago
the wiki is the source
comment on small win: test results stopped being a problem at week 16 in c/labresults · -33 points · 5 months ago
the vial you ordered versus the vial you received might be different batches
comment on [Question] New Zealand — has anyone got a straight answer on lipids in c/bloodwork · 4 points · 5 months ago
Do you have baseline to compare to?
comment on stalled for 14 weeks at 0.5mg and I refuse to panic this time in c/bloodwork · 9 points · 5 months ago
eGFR noise on rapid loss is real. 24 week noise, 40 week trend. Do not panic at week 66.
comment on nobody warned me about nausea and I would have liked the warning in c/coa · 54 points · 5 months ago
redact your own name, not the vendor's batch details
comment on what would you tell week-1 you about purity in c/coa · 5 points · 6 months ago
Disagree. What you are describing is consistent with batch, not with what you concluded.
comment on [Lab] 11th independent test on BCH, and the trend is the interesting part in c/cryptopay · 2 points · 6 months ago
Group buy used escrow. 20 people, 3 shipped without drama. Escrow is the insurance.