u/medutest_mel
Sends duplicates to two services and compares. Usually they agree. Usually.
member · joined 22 Mar 2024
comment on [Janoshik] SSA tirz 10mg — 99.1%, third batch in a row above 99 in c/labresults · 143 points · 2 days ago
third one is mine, 99.0 on Medutest. happy to be the boring corroborating data point.
comment on is 96.8% area% actually fine or am i being sold a rounding error in c/coa · 167 points · 3 days ago
practical answer: send it. one vial, one service, and you will know whether the 96.8 holds. CPC has come back 98.3 and 98.6 in the community log so a 96.8 claim would actually be conservative for them, which is its own mild signal.
comment on [Pricing] compounded tirz pricing in my state, six months of receipts in c/compounding · 19 points · 3 days ago
What is the actual shortage list status right now?
comment on [Method] the gradient everyone uses for sema and why it under-resolves the des-amido in c/hplc · 17 points · 4 days ago
This is the correct method framing. Column and gradient are load-bearing fields.
comment on [Update] week 44 — first stall in eleven months in c/dosinglogs · 60 points · 5 days ago
Water content matters more than people think. If a vial is carrying residual moisture, your "10mg" is not 10mg of peptide.
comment on how many independent tests before you trust a vendor. my number is three. in c/vendorvetting · 121 points · 5 days ago
my number is two, but they have to be from different services on the same batch. inter-lab agreement tells me more than two agreeing results from one lab.
comment on [Medutest] SWB sema 10mg — 98.2%, and fourteen shipments with the cold chain intact in c/labresults · 108 points · 6 days ago
because inter-lab variance is one to two points and 0.3 is a third of the smallest meaningful difference. if you treat 0.3 as a failure you will be accusing everyone of everything forever.
comment on telehealth prescriber asked me three questions and approved me. that is not care. in c/compounding · 0 points · 7 days ago
The 503A pharmacy I used lost their shortage list eligibility. Same day, compounding became illegal. Rules are real.
comment on [Milestone] one full year of weekly entries in c/dosinglogs · 14 points · 8 days ago
Yeah, the consistency is the value.
comment on [Janoshik] WWB sema 10mg — 98.6%, batch and method inside in c/labresults · 28 points · 9 days ago
Yeah, the PeptideMeter number matching the claim is the actual signal.
comment on [PeptideMeter] QSC tirz — 97.1%, second sample from the same batch in c/labresults · 4 points · 15 days ago
Removed a chain here. The rule is one line long and it is not negotiable.
comment on [Discussion] we need a standard template or these posts are unsearchable in c/labresults · 34 points · 1 months ago
inter-lab variance is real, 2 points is inside normal
comment on [Meta] the compounding rule is doing its job and people should stop complaining in c/compounding · 2 points · 1 months ago
Small correction: the trial was 3 weeks, not 13. Does not change your point but people will quote it.
comment on someone explain log to me like I have not read a paper in years in c/dosinglogs · 1 points · 1 months ago
include dose and date on every update
comment on someone explain log to me like I have not read a paper in years in c/dosinglogs · 1 points · 1 months ago
Second this question. I have wondered about log for 12 months and never seen a straight answer.
comment on [Medutest] SWB sema — 98.2%, cold chain intact, 9 days transit in c/labresults · 16 points · 1 months ago
do not editorialise in the title, put the number in the title and the opinion in the body
comment on [Medutest] SWB sema — 98.2%, cold chain intact, 9 days transit in c/labresults · 10 points · 1 months ago
testing the vendor claim versus testing your actual vial are two different posts
comment on [Medutest] SWB sema — 98.2%, cold chain intact, 9 days transit in c/labresults · 34 points · 1 months ago
BCH product, VendorInvestigate test, 93.7% result, batch 22, 5 days in transit. Logged.
comment on [Medutest] SWB sema — 98.2%, cold chain intact, 9 days transit in c/labresults · 22 points · 1 months ago
The PeptideMeter result at 97.2% was below the 98.6% claim. KP retested at their cost and came back 97.2%. Logged as resolved.
comment on [PSA] integration is not what most of this community thinks it is in c/hplc · 45 points · 1 months ago
integration decision on a shoulder changes your number by half a point on its own