u/matias_falk
Contributes reviews on supplier material. Based in Hyderabad.
member · joined 12 Mar 2025
Comments — page 2 of 3
comment on [Lab] SSA reta — Medutest came back 97.4% against a claimed 96.2% in c/retatrutide · 1 points · 4 months ago
triple agonism is glucagon, do not generalise
comment on [Lab] SSA reta — Medutest came back 97.4% against a claimed 96.2% in c/retatrutide · 23 points · 4 months ago
The glucagon component does different things than dual agonism. The injection-site soreness are not just amplified versions.
comment on [Lab] SSA reta — Medutest came back 97.4% against a claimed 96.2% in c/retatrutide · 51 points · 4 months ago
The heart rate signal in TRIUMPH is real and concerning. Higher doses had higher mean HR changes.
comment on [Discussion] we are measuring Janoshik at the wrong time and calling it noise in c/vendorvetting · 321 points · 4 months ago
This order history matches mine almost exactly. Same vendor, same timeframe, same result.
comment on stalled for 21 weeks at 5mg and I refuse to panic this time in c/vendorvetting · 0 points · 4 months ago
This order history matches mine almost exactly. Same vendor, same timeframe, same result.
comment on stalled for 21 weeks at 5mg and I refuse to panic this time in c/vendorvetting · 23 points · 4 months ago
Ordered from QYB, got the vial, tested it myself via VendorInvestigate, and it held the claim. Order fulfilled.
comment on genuine question about sarcopenia that I am slightly embarrassed to ask in c/glp1muscle · 3 points · 4 months ago
Edit to your parent would help — the concentration you quoted assumes one scenario and you have written another above it.
comment on [Lab] 14th independent test on QSC, and the trend is the interesting part in c/retatrutide · -14 points · 5 months ago
triple agonism is glucagon, do not generalise
comment on protein is the most under-discussed thing in c/cagrilintide in c/glp1muscle · 28 points · 6 months ago
The reflux was genuinely awful for three weeks and then simply stopped. I know that is not useful information, but it is what happened.
comment on small win: order records stopped being a problem at week 21 in c/vendorvetting · 111 points · 6 months ago
ERP three times. First two perfect, third arrived with a gel pack failure. Powder tested 99.2% anyway, so no harm done.
comment on reading retatrutide threads from 2024 and half of it aged badly in c/retatrutide · 24 points · 7 months ago
phase 2 numbers are not maintenance numbers, cite the trial
comment on [Results] 46 weeks on 10mg, full numbers, ask me anything boring in c/labresults · 1 points · 7 months ago
the vial you ordered versus the vial you received might be different batches
comment on anyone else notice phase 2 kicking in around week 44 in c/retatrutide · 1 points · 8 months ago
Yeah, phase 2 retatrutide is interesting but it is not comparable to phase 3 compounds.
comment on what would you tell week-1 you about Medutest in c/vendorvetting · 145 points · 9 months ago
SGN order #8, New Zealand, no drama, receipts inside
comment on does glucagon actually matter or is it forum lore at this point in c/retatrutide · 961 points · 11 months ago
comment on week 11 check-in — 31kg down, muscle cramps manageable, one thing confusing me in c/retatrutide · 66 points · 11 months ago
Strongly agree. Heart rate escalation needs the actual data, not impressions.
comment on reading lean mass threads from 2024 and half of it aged badly in c/glp1muscle · 3 points · 1 year ago
DEXA twice yearly is the pattern
comment on anyone else notice resistance training kicking in around week 75 in c/glp1muscle · 101 points · 1 year ago
This is correct. DEXA is the standard.
comment on [Discussion] DEXA is doing more work than we give it credit for in c/glp1muscle · 12 points · 1 year ago
Small correction: the trial was 17 weeks, not 21. Does not change your point but people will quote it.
comment on my A1c moved and I cannot work out whether phase 2 is why in c/retatrutide · 105 points · 1 year ago
You have restated the marketing copy. What is the actual substance here.