u/matias_falk
Contributes reviews on supplier material. Based in Hyderabad.
member · joined 12 Mar 2025
comment on went too fast on reta and my resting HR told me before i noticed in c/retatrutide · 1 points · 1 days ago
TRIUMPH data is phase 2, not phase 3, smaller n and shorter
comment on the glucagon arm is why the appetite effect feels different in c/retatrutide · 141 points · 5 days ago
Strongly agree. Heart rate escalation needs the actual data, not impressions.
comment on [Janoshik] WWB sema 10mg — 98.6%, batch and method inside in c/labresults · 16 points · 8 days ago
Titration speed is a side-effect dial far more than an efficacy dial.
comment on how many independent tests before you trust a vendor. my number is three in c/vendorvetting · 42 points · 9 days ago
the PeptideMeter result being close to the claim is the signal, not the absolute number
comment on [Question] why is reta purity testing so much more variable between labs in c/retatrutide · 12 points · 10 days ago
the glucagon component changes the side effect profile, not just the efficacy
comment on came off reta after 14 weeks. here is the honest version. in c/retatrutide · 3 points · 11 days ago
the 5mg arm is different from 0.25mg, results do not transfer
comment on why does nobody talk about TRIUMPH in c/retatrutide · 11 points · 27 days ago
Dose escalation on retatrutide is steeper and faster than on semaglutide. Do not assume the titration patterns transfer.
comment on why does nobody talk about TRIUMPH in c/retatrutide · 13 points · 27 days ago
retatrutide is not approved anywhere for human use, posts must not read as instructions
comment on [Discussion] we are measuring retatrutide at the wrong time and calling it noise in c/retatrutide · 8 points · 1 months ago
retatrutide is not approved anywhere for human use, posts must not read as instructions
comment on [Needs Source] "lab tested" with no lab named is not a claim in c/vendorvetting · 43 points · 1 months ago
Disagree. What you are describing is consistent with Janoshik, not with what you concluded.
comment on [Lab] four vendors, same compound, same week, one test each in c/labresults · 5 points · 1 months ago
The confident tone is doing a lot of work that the evidence is not.
comment on [Vendor] HJ — small operation, honest about lead times, that is worth something in c/vendorvetting · 6 points · 1 months ago
receipts or nothing, sorry but that is the rule
comment on the glucagon question that gets asked weekly, answered properly in c/retatrutide · 1 points · 1 months ago
phase 2 numbers are not maintenance numbers, cite the trial
comment on the glucagon question that gets asked weekly, answered properly in c/retatrutide · 57 points · 1 months ago
the weight curves are unusually steep, which makes predicting individual response harder
comment on [Vendor] WXT order #24 — Germany, 21 days, no drama, receipts inside in c/retatrutide · 25 points · 2 months ago
TRIUMPH data is phase 2, not phase 3, smaller n and shorter
Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.
comment on [Question] DEXA — what am I missing here in c/glp1muscle · 1 points · 2 months ago
resistance training is protein not optional
comment on switched from 15mg to 12.5mg and the sulphur burps got better, not worse in c/vendorvetting · 59 points · 2 months ago
no
Yes, exactly this, and it is the bit that took me 58 weeks to accept.
comment on [Meta] proposal — a flair for reship posts in c/vendorvetting · 49 points · 3 months ago
Batch number? Date? Method? Give us the load-bearing fields.
comment on [Question] the UK — has anyone got a straight answer on testing in c/vendorvetting · 3 points · 3 months ago
Correct. The batch number is load-bearing information, not optional.
comment on [Results] 87 weeks, 46kg, and FFMI was the hard part in c/glp1muscle · -29 points · 4 months ago
DEXA twice yearly is the pattern