u/maren_sorensen

the rules question is policy, not individual

No. This is the kind of confident post that gets copied into a screenshot and repeated for years. Where is the evidence.

Slight fix: the number was 98.7, not 98.6. Decimal point, but a fairly consequential one.

Week 68 for me and the honest summary is: 7kg down, reflux manageable, and I have thought about food maybe four times today.

Week 61 for me and the honest summary is: 9kg down, constipation manageable, and I have thought about food maybe four times today.

appeal letter templates are in the wiki

Adding to this: external review is doing more work than the comment implies.

Came off after 42 weeks for financial reasons. Regained about a third over the following year. Back on now at a much lower dose.

the small molecule is whether this actually works long-term

France to France takes 9 days on average, variance is 20 days

Not to be pedantic but formulary and appeal are being used interchangeably and they are not interchangeable in real life.

The confident tone is doing a lot of work that the evidence is not.

appeal letter templates are in the wiki

the logger trace is the data that matters, not the packaging promises

data logger is the standard, gut feeling is not

Not to be pedantic but oral GLP-1 and small molecule are being used interchangeably and they are not interchangeable in real life.

time-at-temperature integral is the dose, not just peak temperature

the nausea profile is speculative at this stage

Rodent data is rodent data. Dose scaling is not linear and the models tell you what to investigate, not what to expect.

lyophilised powder is far more forgiving than reconstituted solution

Maintenance for 13 months now. Weight moves within about 3kg and the dose is a quarter of what it peaked at.