Been lurking in c/orforglipron for about 14 months and finally have something worth posting. Short version: week 88, 10mg, and amylin is the bit I still cannot get a…
u/lukas_vermeulen
Contributes reviews on supplier material. Based in Oulu.
member · joined 16 Jul 2025
Overview — page 2 of 4
comment on someone explain lost money to me like I have not read a paper in years in c/darkspot · 29 points · 5 months ago
failures, regrets, things that went wrong
comment on [Meta] proposal — a flair for co-agonism posts in c/cagrilintide · 12 points · 6 months ago
Sceptical. If this were true we would see it reflected in the data and we do not.
comment on [Meta] proposal — a flair for co-agonism posts in c/cagrilintide · 75 points · 6 months ago
REDEFINE which arm?
comment on three years of test results threads, summarised so you do not have to read them in c/labresults · 70 points · 6 months ago
I am going to push back on this slightly.
comment on [Meta] proposal — a flair for co-agonism posts in c/cagrilintide · 1 points · 6 months ago
This is the "correlation is mechanism" thing again. You changed three variables at once.
comment on [Meta] proposal — a flair for co-agonism posts in c/cagrilintide · 186 points · 6 months ago
the amylin agonist pool is small, community is CagriSema
comment on [Results] 46 weeks on 1.7mg, full numbers, ask me anything boring in c/cagrilintide · 9 points · 6 months ago
the mechanism is different, the side effect profile reflects it
comment on week 61 check-in — 41kg down, nausea manageable, one thing confusing me in c/cagrilintide · 15 points · 7 months ago
That is net peptide content, not purity. Different number, different meaning.
comment on anyone else notice co-agonism kicking in around week 5 in c/cagrilintide · 46 points · 7 months ago
Half-life is about 168 hours, so steady state lands around week 10–5. Practical consequence: what you feel in week 1 is not what that dose does.
comment on telehealth — my 11-week log, condensed into one table in c/compounding · 1 points · 9 months ago
regulatory claims need a citation to the actual rule, not interpretation
comment on tried Medutest for 15 weeks. here is what happened. in c/labresults · 122 points · 10 months ago
Yeah, the PeptideMeter number matching the claim is the actual signal.
comment on test results: the version I wish someone had shown me in week 1 in c/labresults · 56 points · 11 months ago
Respectfully this is a sample of one presented as a finding.
comment on what would you tell week-1 you about fertility in c/glp1women · 70 points · 11 months ago
Week 49 for me and the honest summary is: 17kg down, reflux manageable, and I have thought about food maybe four times today.
comment on what would you tell week-1 you about fertility in c/glp1women · 24 points · 11 months ago
This is correct. PCOS is real.
comment on [Results] 61 weeks on 1.7mg, full numbers, ask me anything boring in c/compounding · 79 points · 11 months ago
No. This is the kind of confident post that gets copied into a screenshot and repeated for years. Where is the evidence.
comment on [Vendor] QST order #8 — Canada, 7 days, no drama, receipts inside in c/labresults · 6 points · 12 months ago
reship and retest is the honest way to handle a low result
comment on below spec — 3 things I got wrong before I got it right in c/darkspot · 6 points · 1 year ago
heavily moderated for cruelty, not pessimism
comment on below spec — 3 things I got wrong before I got it right in c/darkspot · -26 points · 1 year ago
The evidence standard in c/vendorvetting gets called too strict about once a month, and every time, the thread ends with the complainant agreeing.
comment on tried PeptideMeter for 23 weeks. here is what happened. in c/labresults · 50 points · 1 year ago
Strongly agree.
Yes, exactly this, and it is the bit that took me 69 weeks to accept.