Trying to settle this properly because the thread from last year went in circles. The claim: units matters. The counter-claim: it is measurement error. Both sides have…
u/liv_nkemelu
Contributes reviews on supplier material. Based in Kaunas.
member · joined 12 Mar 2025
Overview — page 2 of 5
comment on am I the only one who found below spec harder than the injections in c/labresults · 2 points · 2 months ago
This result fits the template perfectly. Logged.
comment on unpopular opinion: reconstitution is massively overrated in c/reconstitution · 21 points · 2 months ago
Disagree but this is the good kind of wrong — it is specific enough to be checked.
comment on unpopular opinion: reconstitution is massively overrated in c/reconstitution · 28 points · 2 months ago
dosing errors come from people reconstituting two vials differently and forgetting which is which
comment on what would you tell week-1 you about certificate of analysis in c/coa · 3 points · 3 months ago
area% is not mass%, and here is exactly why it matters
comment on [Question] units — what am I missing here in c/reconstitution · 23 points · 3 months ago
Cosigning. The concentration on the vial in marker is load-bearing.
comment on [Question] units — what am I missing here in c/reconstitution · 25 points · 3 months ago
stopper coring on the 21th draw because you keep using the same entry point. rotate.
comment on COA: what the trials say vs what this community says in c/coa · 108 points · 4 months ago
Asked SGN for the batch-specific COA and they sent it within six hours, full document, batch number, date, everything. That is the baseline.
comment on COA: what the trials say vs what this community says in c/coa · 0 points · 4 months ago
No. This is the kind of confident post that gets copied into a screenshot and repeated for years. Where is the evidence.
comment on COA: what the trials say vs what this community says in c/coa · 1 points · 4 months ago
Tested the GLB raw material and a reseller vial side-by-side. Same purity claim, different impurity profiles. Handling matters.
Been lurking in c/tirzepatide for about 22 months and finally have something worth posting. Short version: week 69, 1.7mg, and water content is the bit I still cannot…
Week 91 update. 22kg down from the start, muscle cramps basically gone since about week 48. Things that worked: consistency, protein at breakfast, walking more than I…
comment on small win: test results stopped being a problem at week 16 in c/labresults · 4 points · 5 months ago
template required: vendor / product / batch / service / method / result
comment on small win: test results stopped being a problem at week 16 in c/labresults · 5 points · 5 months ago
Not to be pedantic but test results and Medutest are being used interchangeably and they are not interchangeable in real life.
Yes, exactly this, and it is the bit that took me 38 weeks to accept.
comment on [Results] 67 weeks, 11kg, and Australia was the hard part in c/glp1aus · 0 points · 5 months ago
Week 48 for me and the honest summary is: 16kg down, muscle cramps manageable, and I have thought about food maybe four times today.
comment on France: mg/mL, and what it actually costs here in c/reconstitution · 26 points · 6 months ago
Show the arithmetic. Where did the units come from?
comment on [Lab] SGN BPC — VendorInvestigate came back 93.7% against a claimed 94.2% in c/coa · 530 points · 6 months ago
purity and net content are two different numbers, same vial
comment on Spain: concentration, and what it actually costs here in c/reconstitution · 20 points · 6 months ago
The single most useful thing I did was write the concentration on the vial. Stopped all the confusion after that.
comment on Spain: concentration, and what it actually costs here in c/reconstitution · 132 points · 6 months ago
This is the "correlation is mechanism" thing again. You changed three variables at once.
comment on Spain: concentration, and what it actually costs here in c/reconstitution · 353 points · 6 months ago
Are you using a u-100 or u-40 syringe? That changes everything.