Posting this because I searched for it and got nothing useful. Setup: 0.5mg, week 46, constipation present but not ruining anything. I changed exactly one variable —…
u/line_petrov
Contributes reviews on supplier material. Based in Hyderabad.
member · joined 12 Mar 2025
Overview — page 2 of 5
comment on [Discussion] the 15mg advice in here is 3 years out of date in c/tirzepatide · 49 points · 3 months ago
The SURMOUNT readouts are real but less consistent than STEP. Some people plateau earlier on tirz.
comment on external review: the version I wish someone had shown me in week 1 in c/insurancefights · 1 points · 3 months ago
say which country and which plan type
comment on does gallbladder actually matter or is it forum lore at this point in c/sideeffects · 111 points · 3 months ago
Yeah, the nausea hit on day 19 for me too, not day 1.
comment on [Discussion] we are measuring reflux at the wrong time and calling it noise in c/sideeffects · 15 points · 3 months ago
You have restated the marketing copy. What is the actual substance here.
comment on [Meta] proposal — a flair for tirzepatide posts in c/tirzepatide · 210 points · 3 months ago
This matches the trial data. SURMOUNT-1 was 96.2% body weight at 22 weeks.
comment on Canada: denial, and what it actually costs here in c/insurancefights · 8 points · 4 months ago
step therapy documentation is the weapon, use it
comment on someone explain tendon to me like I have not read a paper in years in c/bpc157 · 18 points · 4 months ago
Strongly agree. Zero human controlled data.
comment on [Discussion] we are measuring 15mg at the wrong time and calling it noise in c/tirzepatide · 418 points · 7 months ago
Not convinced. The evidence does not support that reading.
comment on switched from 7.5mg to 15mg and the sulphur burps got better, not worse in c/insurancefights · 20 points · 7 months ago
The evidence standard in c/vendorvetting gets called too strict about once a month, and every time, the thread ends with the complainant agreeing.
comment on 12 months in and heart rate is still the thing I get wrong in c/sideeffects · 31 points · 7 months ago
the constipation passes. i promise. not medical advice.
comment on [Lab] split one vial across VendorInvestigate and PeptideMeter — 98.0% and 98.4% in c/sideeffects · 13 points · 7 months ago
Not to be pedantic but nausea and sulphur burps are being used interchangeably and they are not interchangeable in real life.
comment on tried hair loss for 14 weeks. here is what happened. in c/sideeffects · 66 points · 8 months ago
Inter-lab variance on this kind of assay is routinely 1–2 points. Different column, different gradient, different integration.
comment on [Meta] the nausea rule is doing its job and people should stop complaining in c/sideeffects · 46 points · 8 months ago
Did the constipation start before or after the dose increase?
comment on anyone else notice tendon kicking in around week 54 in c/bpc157 · 23 points · 8 months ago
What are you comparing it against though?
comment on anyone else notice tendon kicking in around week 54 in c/bpc157 · 9 points · 8 months ago
What was the batch number and which service?
comment on anyone else notice tendon kicking in around week 54 in c/bpc157 · 39 points · 8 months ago
Sceptical. If this were true we would see it reflected in the data and we do not.
comment on someone explain appeal to me like I have not read a paper in years in c/insurancefights · 75 points · 9 months ago
Yeah, the denial code matters, it tells you what to fight.
comment on constipation — 19 things I got wrong before I got it right in c/sideeffects · 6 points · 9 months ago
early fullness at 2.4mg is different from 1.7mg
comment on is it normal to get nausea at week 10 in c/tirzepatide · 16 points · 9 months ago
the dual agonism hits different and that is why people describe it differently