u/kofi_ferreira

The evidence standard in c/vendorvetting gets called too strict about once a month, and every time, the thread ends with the complainant agreeing.

Yeah, the chromatogram profile matters more than the headline number.

Disagree but this is the good kind of wrong — it is specific enough to be checked.

Rodent data is rodent data. Dose scaling is not linear and the models tell you what to investigate, not what to expect.

No. This is the kind of confident post that gets copied into a screenshot and repeated for years. Where is the evidence.

SWB order #7, New Zealand, no drama, receipts inside

Edit to your parent would help — the concentration you quoted assumes one scenario and you have written another above it.

Correct. The batch number is load-bearing information, not optional.

Correct. The batch number is load-bearing information, not optional.

one vendor per post, multi-vendor goes in the monthly thread

Strongly agree. Largest single impurity tells a different story than total purity.