Trying to settle this properly because the thread from last year went in circles. The claim: moderation matters. The counter-claim: it is measurement error. Both sides…
u/kenji_demir
Contributes reviews on supplier material. Based in Kumasi.
member · joined 12 Mar 2025
Overview — page 2 of 4
comment on [Discussion] can we stop arguing about wiki until somebody posts a number in c/meta · 0 points · 4 months ago
the evidence standards are rules
comment on anyone else notice Medutest kicking in around week 30 in c/labresults · -5 points · 4 months ago
reship and retest is the honest way to handle a low result
comment on [Meta] proposal — a flair for plateau posts in c/semaglutide · 67 points · 4 months ago
Slight fix: the number was 96.8, not 94.2. Decimal point, but a fairly consequential one.
comment on small win: test results stopped being a problem at week 16 in c/labresults · 12 points · 5 months ago
This result fits the template perfectly. Logged.
comment on three years of rules threads, summarised so you do not have to read them in c/meta · 70 points · 5 months ago
Water content matters more than people think. If a vial is carrying residual moisture, your "10mg" is not 10mg of peptide.
comment on the excursion thing finally clicked for me and I want to write it down in c/coldchain · 1 points · 6 months ago
Reconstituted or dry powder?
comment on ranking: what the trials say vs what this community says in c/meta · 27 points · 6 months ago
rule-change proposals need concrete wording
comment on PeptideMeter vs batch — genuinely asking which matters more in c/labresults · 25 points · 8 months ago
the vial you ordered versus the vial you received might be different batches
comment on semaglutide — my 2-week log, condensed into one table in c/semaglutide · 87 points · 9 months ago
Yeah, 48 weeks on 7.5mg, same pattern, same timing.
comment on [Question] is 97.9% actually fine or am I being sold a rounding error in c/semaglutide · 14 points · 9 months ago
No. This is the kind of confident post that gets copied into a screenshot and repeated for years. Where is the evidence.
comment on is it normal to get reflux at week 50 in c/labresults · 19 points · 9 months ago
testing the vendor claim versus testing your actual vial are two different posts
comment on 14 months in and insulin resistance is still the thing I get wrong in c/glp1women · 55 points · 10 months ago
Yeah, contraception is under-researched.
comment on week 76 check-in — 12kg down, fatigue manageable, one thing confusing me in c/labresults · 113 points · 10 months ago
do not editorialise in the title, put the number in the title and the opinion in the body
comment on test results: the version I wish someone had shown me in week 1 in c/labresults · 35 points · 11 months ago
I am going to push back on this slightly.
comment on [Vendor] QST order #4 — Denmark, 37 days, no drama, receipts inside in c/meta · 4 points · 11 months ago
Disagree but this is the good kind of wrong — it is specific enough to be checked.
Disagree on that part. 97.4% and 97.6% on the same vial is normal.
comment on [Vendor] QST order #4 — Denmark, 37 days, no drama, receipts inside in c/meta · -32 points · 11 months ago
Slight fix: the number was 99.0, not 98.9. Decimal point, but a fairly consequential one.
comment on does packaging actually matter or is it forum lore at this point in c/coldchain · 42 points · 11 months ago
Edit to your parent would help — the concentration you quoted assumes one scenario and you have written another above it.
comment on help me understand plateau, I have read the wiki twice in c/semaglutide · 19 points · 1 year ago
Edit to your parent would help — the concentration you quoted assumes one scenario and you have written another above it.
comment on [Discussion] can we stop arguing about moderation until somebody posts a number in c/meta · 10 points · 1 year ago
the ranking formula is meta