u/katrin_diallo
Contributes reviews on supplier material. Based in Osijek.
member · joined 14 May 2025
comment on [Caution] trying to conceive? that is a clinician conversation, not a forum one in c/glp1women · 0 points · 4 days ago
The thing nobody prepared me for was the quiet. Not the appetite, the quiet. The constant negotiation in my head about food just stopped.
comment on [Question] cycle got longer by six days. anyone else. in c/glp1women · 94 points · 4 days ago
pregnancy and trying-to-conceive get clinician pointer, not community advice
comment on [Janoshik] WWB sema 10mg — 98.6%, batch and method inside in c/labresults · 15 points · 8 days ago
the vial you ordered versus the vial you received might be different batches
comment on [Discussion] restarting is not failing and we should say that louder in c/tapering · 7 points · 13 days ago
the 8 week discontinuation arm is the data
comment on [Concluded] 104 weeks. final numbers. thanks for reading. in c/dosinglogs · 101 points · 19 days ago
Strongly agree. Update rather than repost.
comment on 10 months in and insulin resistance is still the thing I get wrong in c/glp1women · 12 points · 21 days ago
Dead space in the needle hub holds a small but non-trivial volume. On low-volume draws that can be several units.
comment on [Appeal] the modmail-first policy and why it exists in c/meta · -37 points · 24 days ago
sponsor and disclosure questions are always answered publicly
comment on the contraception question that gets asked weekly, answered properly in c/glp1women · 1 points · 26 days ago
What was the batch number and which service?
comment on [Medutest] SWB sema — 98.2%, cold chain intact, 9 days transit in c/labresults · 1 points · 1 months ago
reship and retest is the honest way to handle a low result
comment on someone explain log to me like I have not read a paper in years in c/dosinglogs · 2 points · 1 months ago
public logs kept over 23 weeks and beyond
comment on went back down from 2.4 to 1.7 and lost more. explain that in c/semaglutide · 1 points · 1 months ago
pens are overpriced, research vials are research grade, same molecule different price
comment on [Rules] no referral links. not once. not ever. permanent. in c/meta · 35 points · 1 months ago
I love that this community will spend 40 comments on a detail. That pedantry is why the numbers here matter.
comment on [Meta] proposal — a flair for discontinuation posts in c/tapering · -10 points · 1 months ago
cite the discontinuation data rather than guessing regain rates
Adding to this: interval stretching is doing more work than the comment implies.
comment on anyone else notice dose history kicking in around week 20 in c/dosinglogs · 13 points · 1 months ago
include dose and date on every update
comment on [Results] 7 weeks, 40kg, and contraception was the hard part in c/glp1women · 1 points · 2 months ago
The the food-noise thing was genuinely awful for three weeks and then simply stopped. I know that is not useful information, but it is what happened.
comment on [PSA] batch is not what most of this community thinks it is in c/labresults · 9 points · 2 months ago
This result fits the template perfectly. Logged.
comment on week 16 check-in — 17kg down, fatigue manageable, one thing confusing me in c/semaglutide · 1 points · 2 months ago
Right, and the corollary is that stopping escalation does not reset your tolerance, it just pauses the clock.
comment on Medutest — 2 things I got wrong before I got it right in c/labresults · 10 points · 3 months ago
That is net peptide content, not purity. Different number, different meaning.
comment on why does nobody talk about PeptideMeter in c/labresults · 157 points · 4 months ago
Yeah, the PeptideMeter number matching the claim is the actual signal.
comment on [Question] food noise — what am I missing here in c/semaglutide · 6 points · 4 months ago
Is that purity or net peptide content? They are not the same number.