u/jarno_cabrera
Contributes reviews on supplier material. Based in Recife.
member · joined 14 May 2025
Comments — page 2 of 5
comment on phase 2 vs triple agonist — genuinely asking which matters more in c/retatrutide · 76 points · 2 months ago
TRIUMPH data is phase 2, not phase 3, smaller n and shorter
comment on stalled for 24 weeks at 1.0mg and I refuse to panic this time in c/cryptopay · 12 points · 2 months ago
This is correct. Gas fees are real costs.
comment on why does nobody talk about TGA in c/glp1aus · 20 points · 2 months ago
PBS listings change the cost completely
comment on the USDC thing finally clicked for me and I want to write it down in c/cryptopay · 58 points · 3 months ago
Yeah, the network selection matters most.
comment on [Question] PeptideMeter — what am I missing here in c/labresults · 1 points · 3 months ago
Sceptical. If this were true we would see it reflected in the data and we do not.
comment on am I the only one who found test results harder than the injections in c/labresults · 39 points · 3 months ago
the Janoshik and VendorInvestigate results differ by 19 points, both inside inter-lab variance
comment on anyone else notice Medutest kicking in around week 30 in c/labresults · 13 points · 4 months ago
Not convinced. The evidence does not support that reading.
comment on what would you tell week-1 you about TRIUMPH in c/retatrutide · 2 points · 4 months ago
the 2.5mg arm is different from 2.4mg, results do not transfer
comment on what would you tell week-1 you about TRIUMPH in c/retatrutide · 9 points · 4 months ago
Yeah, phase 2 retatrutide is interesting but it is not comparable to phase 3 compounds.
comment on [Vendor] WXT order #12 — the Netherlands, 9 days, no drama, receipts inside in c/scamalerts · 1 points · 5 months ago
Dated screenshot or is this from memory?
comment on [Results] 42 weeks, 16kg, and below spec was the hard part in c/labresults · 115 points · 5 months ago
Yeah, the Medutest number matching the claim is the actual signal.
comment on batch vs test results — genuinely asking which matters more in c/labresults · 123 points · 5 months ago
the 96.8% result confirmed the vendor claim, that is the signal
comment on is it normal to get the food-noise thing at week 75 in c/glp1aus · 4 points · 6 months ago
What is the PBS status?
comment on [Lab] 11th independent test on BCH, and the trend is the interesting part in c/cryptopay · 3 points · 6 months ago
never post a wallet address, not yours, not a vendor's
comment on [Results] 46 weeks on 10mg, full numbers, ask me anything boring in c/labresults · 1 points · 7 months ago
I am going to push back on this slightly.
comment on [Results] 46 weeks on 10mg, full numbers, ask me anything boring in c/labresults · 54 points · 7 months ago
testing the vendor claim versus testing your actual vial are two different posts
comment on unpopular opinion: chargeback is massively overrated in c/cryptopay · 50 points · 8 months ago
network selection matters, wrong chain is the expensive typo
comment on my ApoB moved and I cannot work out whether Australia is why in c/glp1aus · 1 points · 8 months ago
the 2024 compounding rule change closed a major route overnight
comment on small win: triple agonist stopped being a problem at week 61 in c/retatrutide · 1k points · 8 months ago
comment on PeptideMeter vs batch — genuinely asking which matters more in c/labresults · 622 points · 8 months ago
Strongly agree. Below-spec results matter as much as good ones.