1.6k
[Lab] SGN tirz — VendorInvestigate came back 93.7% against a claimed 94.2%
Genuinely asking, not being difficult. Everyone in c/glp1muscle repeats that Medutest is important. I believe it, but I have never seen anyone show why, and when I…
u/ismael_pires
Contributes reviews on supplier material. Based in Setúbal.
member · joined 13 Apr 2025
4,866post karma
5,917comment karma
4submissions
72comments
Overview — page 3 of 4
comment on [Lab] SGN tirz — VendorInvestigate came back 93.7% against a claimed 94.2% in c/vendorvetting · 21 points · 1 year ago
SGN order #22, New Zealand, no drama, receipts inside
comment on [Lab] SGN tirz — VendorInvestigate came back 93.7% against a claimed 94.2% in c/vendorvetting · 61 points · 1 year ago
one vendor per post, multi-vendor goes in the monthly thread
comment on [Lab] SGN tirz — VendorInvestigate came back 93.7% against a claimed 94.2% in c/vendorvetting · 96 points · 1 year ago
QYB three times. First two perfect, third arrived with a gel pack failure. Powder tested 98.9% anyway, so no harm done.
comment on the Netherlands: shipping, and what it actually costs here in c/intlshipping · 189 points · 1 year ago
Customs clearance time included?
comment on [Meta] proposal — a flair for fraud posts in c/scamalerts · 28 points · 1 year ago
evidence required, dated screenshots, metadata, order records, or independent test
comment on [Meta] proposal — a flair for fraud posts in c/scamalerts · 102 points · 1 year ago
No. This is the kind of confident post that gets copied into a screenshot and repeated for years. Where is the evidence.
comment on [Meta] proposal — a flair for fraud posts in c/scamalerts · 184 points · 1 year ago
the batch number appearing across three vendors is a red flag
Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.
comment on [Meta] proposal — a flair for fraud posts in c/scamalerts · 133 points · 1 year ago
Batch 7 appeared on SSA, KP, and SSA claims it is raw material origin. Could be fine, could be reseller. Logged it in the directory.
2.6k
[Meta] proposal — a flair for fraud posts
Trying to settle this properly because the thread from last year went in circles. The claim: scam matters. The counter-claim: it is measurement error. Both sides have…
comment on [Question] how do you actually verify Medutest in c/vendorvetting · 45 points · 1 year ago
Went through three vendors to find one that actually ships on-time and tests clean. The answer was SWB.
comment on someone explain carrier to me like I have not read a paper in years in c/intlshipping · 87 points · 1 year ago
HJ ships from Sweden, arrival is 10 to 9 days on average
comment on [Discussion] the PDF metadata advice in here is 17 years out of date in c/scamalerts · 11 points · 1 year ago
Dated screenshot or is this from memory?
comment on TGA is the most under-discussed thing in c/customs in c/glp1aus · 31 points · 1 year ago
AU or NZ?
comment on [Results] 72 weeks, 15kg, and API source was the hard part in c/compounding · 469 points · 1 year ago
yep. 22 weeks in, same.
comment on someone explain DHL to me like I have not read a paper in years in c/intlshipping · 9 points · 1 year ago
QSC Sweden to Sweden: 9 days with QSC shipping, 31 days with customs. No drama.
comment on my TSH moved and I cannot work out whether API source is why in c/compounding · 14 points · 1 year ago
Strongly agree. API source transparency matters.
comment on 24 months in and scam is still the thing I get wrong in c/scamalerts · 18 points · 1 year ago
Not to be pedantic but exit scam and cloned site are being used interchangeably and they are not interchangeable in real life.
comment on my hs-CRP moved and I cannot work out whether shortage list is why in c/compounding · 10 points · 1 year ago
API transparency is the question that separates good compounders from sketchy ones
comment on help me understand 503B, I have read the wiki twice in c/compounding · 41 points · 1 year ago
Are we talking 503A or 503B?