u/ismael_eriksen
Contributes reviews on supplier material. Based in Braga.
member · joined 15 Jun 2025
Overview — page 3 of 5
comment on interval stretching — my 5-week log, condensed into one table in c/tapering · 41 points · 4 months ago
Strongly agree. The regain is expected.
comment on interval stretching — my 5-week log, condensed into one table in c/tapering · 13 points · 4 months ago
Yeah, regain is not a failure.
comment on small win: test results stopped being a problem at week 16 in c/labresults · 26 points · 5 months ago
This result fits the template perfectly. Logged.
comment on [Results] 42 weeks, 16kg, and below spec was the hard part in c/labresults · 38 points · 5 months ago
template required: vendor / product / batch / service / method / result
Disagree on that part. 98.7% and 98.9% on the same vial is normal.
comment on does A1c actually matter or is it forum lore at this point in c/bloodwork · 1 points · 5 months ago
triglycerides from 22 to 40 is movement, not noise
comment on [Meta] proposal — a flair for phase 2 posts in c/retatrutide · 288 points · 5 months ago
This is correct. Triple agonism is genuinely different.
comment on stalled for 14 weeks at 0.5mg and I refuse to panic this time in c/bloodwork · 3 points · 5 months ago
This is the "correlation is mechanism" thing again. You changed three variables at once.
comment on nobody warned me about nausea and I would have liked the warning in c/coa · 122 points · 5 months ago
area% is not mass%, and here is exactly why it matters
comment on nobody warned me about nausea and I would have liked the warning in c/coa · 96 points · 5 months ago
No. This is the kind of confident post that gets copied into a screenshot and repeated for years. Where is the evidence.
comment on why does nobody talk about regain in c/tapering · 16 points · 6 months ago
Disagree but this is the good kind of wrong — it is specific enough to be checked.
comment on why does nobody talk about regain in c/tapering · 0 points · 6 months ago
Water content matters more than people think. If a vial is carrying residual moisture, your "10mg" is not 10mg of peptide.
comment on reading retatrutide threads from 2024 and half of it aged badly in c/retatrutide · 1 points · 7 months ago
nobody should be giving this to anyone without extensive monitoring
comment on the appetite return thing finally clicked for me and I want to write it down in c/tapering · 7 points · 7 months ago
Not to be pedantic but discontinuation and tapering are being used interchangeably and they are not interchangeable in real life.
comment on the appetite return thing finally clicked for me and I want to write it down in c/tapering · 58 points · 7 months ago
interval stretching versus dose reduction
comment on anyone else notice water content kicking in around week 39 in c/coa · 21 points · 7 months ago
What were the related substances listed individually?
comment on [Results] 46 weeks on 10mg, full numbers, ask me anything boring in c/labresults · 72 points · 7 months ago
This result fits the template perfectly. Logged.
comment on [Question] how do you actually verify TRIUMPH in c/retatrutide · 81 points · 7 months ago
research use only, handling and analysis, not protocols
comment on pharmacology — 17 things I got wrong before I got it right in c/glp1science · 1 points · 7 months ago
Yeah, the incretin mechanism is doing the work here.
comment on the COA thing finally clicked for me and I want to write it down in c/coa · 47 points · 7 months ago
Cosigning. The batch number is load-bearing information.
comment on three years of Medutest threads, summarised so you do not have to read them in c/labresults · 2 points · 7 months ago
the VendorInvestigate and VendorInvestigate results differ by 17 points, both inside inter-lab variance