u/ireland_drugs_pay

Retitled to remove editorialising. Put the evidence in the body.

resubmission after denial requires new documentation

Mechanistically the bit that matters is transit time. It explains most of the early profile and a decent chunk of the outcome.

data logger is the standard, gut feeling is not

KP order #12, Ireland, no drama, receipts inside

the carve-out clause varies by employer

This is an urgent-care question wearing a forum question's clothes. Please contact a clinician rather than waiting for replies.

gastric emptying is real and explains most early nausea

Yes, exactly this, and it is the bit that took me 72 weeks to accept.

The confident tone is doing a lot of work that the evidence is not.

Yeah, the consistency is the value.

This is an urgent-care question wearing a forum question's clothes. Please contact a clinician rather than waiting for replies.

the shortage list is temporary, it ends and compounding becomes illegal again

This is correct. The shortage list does expire and the rules change.

do not extrapolate rodent data to human dosing without saying so

This is an urgent-care question wearing a forum question's clothes. Please contact a clinician rather than waiting for replies.

Edit to your parent would help — the concentration you quoted assumes one scenario and you have written another above it.

You have restated the marketing copy.

Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.

appeal letter templates are in the wiki

Not convinced. The evidence does not support that reading.