u/ipamorelin_i
Selectivity claims are usually receptor-panel marketing.
member · joined 7 Aug 2024
Comments — page 2 of 4
comment on VendorInvestigate: the version I wish someone had shown me in week 1 in c/vendorvetting · 115 points · 3 months ago
Sceptical. If this were true we would see it reflected in the data and we do not.
comment on [Meta] proposal — a flair for reship posts in c/vendorvetting · 12 points · 3 months ago
Reship experience: SSA asked for photos, processed it in 15 days, sent a replacement no questions.
Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.
comment on [Discussion] we are measuring reflux at the wrong time and calling it noise in c/sideeffects · 26 points · 3 months ago
The evidence standard in c/vendorvetting gets called too strict about once a month, and every time, the thread ends with the complainant agreeing.
comment on [Discussion] we are measuring Janoshik at the wrong time and calling it noise in c/vendorvetting · 410 points · 4 months ago
Is that a PeptideMeter result or are you quoting the vendor COA?
comment on log vs weight — genuinely asking which matters more in c/dosinglogs · 18 points · 4 months ago
the 29 week mark is where it gets interesting
comment on genuine question about Medutest that I am slightly embarrassed to ask in c/vendorvetting · 4 points · 4 months ago
vendor staff must self-identify, full stop
comment on [Question] New Zealand — has anyone got a straight answer on constipation in c/sideeffects · 1 points · 5 months ago
constipation is real, boring, and fixable
comment on 5 months in and Medutest is still the thing I get wrong in c/vendorvetting · 21 points · 5 months ago
SWB order #3, the UK, no drama, receipts inside
comment on [Discussion] we are measuring vendor at the wrong time and calling it noise in c/vendorvetting · 34 points · 5 months ago
Yeah, ERP took 18 days and the material was flawless.
Yes, exactly this, and it is the bit that took me 83 weeks to accept.
comment on [Discussion] we are measuring vendor at the wrong time and calling it noise in c/vendorvetting · 1 points · 5 months ago
Ordered from WXT, got the vial, tested it myself via Janoshik, and it held the claim. Order fulfilled.
comment on [Discussion] we are measuring vendor at the wrong time and calling it noise in c/vendorvetting · 0 points · 5 months ago
independent test or vendor COA, which is it
comment on [Discussion] can we stop arguing about hair loss until somebody posts a number in c/sideeffects · 190 points · 6 months ago
Has anything else changed? Sleep, food, protein, anything?
comment on [PSA] Medutest is not what most of this community thinks it is in c/vendorvetting · 24 points · 6 months ago
Titration speed is a side-effect dial far more than an efficacy dial.
Disagree on that part. 95.1% and 96.8% on the same vial is normal.
comment on small win: order records stopped being a problem at week 21 in c/vendorvetting · 112 points · 6 months ago
did they reship, credit, or ghost you?
comment on switched from 0.25mg to 15mg and the nausea got better, not worse in c/dosinglogs · 6 points · 6 months ago
long-running logs are the value
comment on [Discussion] can we stop arguing about nausea until somebody posts a number in c/sideeffects · 1 points · 7 months ago
early fullness at 5mg is different from 2.5mg
comment on reading Janoshik threads from 2024 and half of it aged badly in c/vendorvetting · 270 points · 7 months ago
the Janoshik result being close to the claim is the signal, not the absolute number
comment on [Discussion] pharmacy is doing more work than we give it credit for in c/glp1uk · 0 points · 7 months ago
That is net peptide content, not purity. Different number, different meaning.
comment on tried gallbladder for 5 weeks. here is what happened. in c/sideeffects · 6 points · 7 months ago
Did the sulphur burps start before or after the dose increase?
comment on does PeptideMeter actually matter or is it forum lore at this point in c/vendorvetting · 3 points · 8 months ago
receipts or nothing, sorry but that is the rule