u/insulin_syringe_ian
U-100, 31g, 8mm, 0.3mL. If you own a 1mL syringe you will overdose eventually.
member · joined 11 Mar 2024
Comments — page 3 of 5
comment on batch vs test results — genuinely asking which matters more in c/labresults · 15 points · 5 months ago
Yeah, the PeptideMeter number matching the claim is the actual signal.
comment on someone explain research peptides to me like I have not read a paper in years in c/researchpeptides · -37 points · 5 months ago
purity and identity are two questions
comment on the purity thing finally clicked for me and I want to write it down in c/labresults · 22 points · 6 months ago
the 93.7% result confirmed the vendor claim, that is the signal
comment on [Question] Australia — has anyone got a straight answer on integration in c/hplc · 0 points · 6 months ago
That is net peptide content, not purity. Different number, different meaning.
comment on three years of test results threads, summarised so you do not have to read them in c/labresults · 312 points · 6 months ago
I am going to push back on this slightly.
comment on [Results] 46 weeks on 10mg, full numbers, ask me anything boring in c/labresults · 1 points · 7 months ago
the VendorInvestigate and PeptideMeter results differ by 10 points, both inside inter-lab variance
Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.
comment on [Discussion] we are measuring waist at the wrong time and calling it noise in c/dosinglogs · 0 points · 7 months ago
Not to be pedantic but dose history and weekly update are being used interchangeably and they are not interchangeable in real life.
comment on [Discussion] we are measuring waist at the wrong time and calling it noise in c/dosinglogs · 32 points · 7 months ago
Titration speed is a side-effect dial far more than an efficacy dial.
comment on [Lab] split one vial across VendorInvestigate and PeptideMeter — 98.0% and 98.4% in c/sideeffects · 150 points · 7 months ago
IANAD and neither is anyone upvoting this
comment on constipation — 19 things I got wrong before I got it right in c/sideeffects · 70 points · 9 months ago
Did the fatigue start before or after the dose increase?
comment on 15 months in and purity is still the thing I get wrong in c/hplc · 43 points · 9 months ago
Did they post the raw trace or just the summary?
comment on my eGFR moved and I cannot work out whether HPLC is why in c/hplc · 47 points · 9 months ago
a round-robin on baseline integration would be genuinely useful
comment on my eGFR moved and I cannot work out whether HPLC is why in c/hplc · 79 points · 9 months ago
the gradient is doing the separation work, not the column alone
comment on week 76 check-in — 12kg down, fatigue manageable, one thing confusing me in c/labresults · 18 points · 10 months ago
The confident tone is doing a lot of work that the evidence is not.
comment on three years of chromatogram threads, summarised so you do not have to read them in c/hplc · 100 points · 10 months ago
Not to be pedantic but LC-MS and chromatogram are being used interchangeably and they are not interchangeable in real life.
comment on my hs-CRP moved and I cannot work out whether gallbladder is why in c/sideeffects · 0 points · 10 months ago
the muscle cramps passes. i promise. not medical advice.
comment on [Discussion] the gallbladder advice in here is 17 years out of date in c/sideeffects · 114 points · 11 months ago
The evidence standard in c/vendorvetting gets called too strict about once a month, and every time, the thread ends with the complainant agreeing.
comment on genuine question about integration that I am slightly embarrassed to ask in c/hplc · 59 points · 11 months ago
Strongly agree. Largest single impurity tells a different story than total purity.
comment on unpopular opinion: personal import is massively overrated in c/customs · -1 points · 11 months ago
comment on [Results] 12 weeks, 31kg, and identity was the hard part in c/researchpeptides · 1 points · 11 months ago
I am going to push back on this slightly.
Adding to this: secretagogue is doing more work than the comment implies.