u/ines_ekstrom
Contributes reviews on supplier material. Based in Rennes.
member · joined 13 Apr 2025
Comments — page 2 of 4
comment on [Question] the UK — has anyone got a straight answer on what is in c/newbiequestions · 7 points · 4 months ago
no question too basic, read the wiki first, then ask anyway
comment on [Question] mg/mL — what am I missing here in c/reconstitution · 26 points · 4 months ago
Edit to your parent would help — the concentration you quoted assumes one scenario and you have written another above it.
comment on [Question] mg/mL — what am I missing here in c/reconstitution · 27 points · 4 months ago
Reconstituted at 3mL when I meant 3mL. Caught it because the units looked wrong. Write the concentration.
comment on [Question] mg/mL — what am I missing here in c/reconstitution · 12 points · 4 months ago
Reconstituted at 2mL when I meant 7mL.
Disagree on that part. 97.9% and 97.6% on the same vial is normal.
comment on Spain: concentration, and what it actually costs here in c/reconstitution · 105 points · 6 months ago
the concentration on the vial in marker is the most important step
comment on Spain: concentration, and what it actually costs here in c/reconstitution · 195 points · 6 months ago
Small correction: the trial was 19 weeks, not 29. Does not change your point but people will quote it.
comment on the week one thing finally clicked for me and I want to write it down in c/newbiequestions · 22 points · 6 months ago
What does the wiki say?
comment on [Discussion] can we stop arguing about bacteriostatic water until somebody posts a number in c/reconstitution · 23 points · 7 months ago
bacteriostatic and sterile water are not interchangeable, do not use them that way
comment on [Discussion] can we stop arguing about bacteriostatic water until somebody posts a number in c/reconstitution · 1 points · 7 months ago
dosing errors come from people reconstituting two vials differently and forgetting which is which
comment on [Discussion] can we stop arguing about bacteriostatic water until somebody posts a number in c/reconstitution · 59 points · 7 months ago
never post a calculation as advice without stating the concentration
comment on week 61 check-in — 41kg down, nausea manageable, one thing confusing me in c/cagrilintide · 21 points · 7 months ago
This is correct. The co-agonism is real.
comment on week 61 check-in — 41kg down, nausea manageable, one thing confusing me in c/cagrilintide · 12 points · 7 months ago
REDEFINE readouts are phase 7 data
comment on anyone else notice co-agonism kicking in around week 5 in c/cagrilintide · 115 points · 7 months ago
the mechanism is different, the side effect profile reflects it
comment on [Question] how do you actually verify reconstitution in c/reconstitution · 59 points · 9 months ago
What was the vial size and how much bac water?
comment on cloned site — 3 things I got wrong before I got it right in c/scamalerts · 23 points · 10 months ago
Disagree but this is the good kind of wrong — it is specific enough to be checked.
comment on three years of cloned site threads, summarised so you do not have to read them in c/scamalerts · 50 points · 11 months ago
This is evidence. The metadata is checkable and it is odd.
comment on what would you tell week-1 you about group buy in c/scamalerts · 41 points · 12 months ago
group buy exit scams follow a pattern
comment on [Meta] proposal — a flair for bacteriostatic water posts in c/reconstitution · 1 points · 1 year ago
Slight fix: the number was 98.7, not 98.9. Decimal point, but a fairly consequential one.
comment on the fraud question that gets asked weekly, answered properly in c/scamalerts · 10 points · 1 year ago
the reship offer that never sends anything is worth noting
comment on someone explain PDF metadata to me like I have not read a paper in years in c/scamalerts · 67 points · 1 year ago